Dueñas-Gonzalez Alfonso, Cetina Lucely, Mariscal Ignacio, de la Garza Jaime
Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, UNAM, 14080 Tlalpan, Mexico.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2003 Oct;29(5):389-99. doi: 10.1016/s0305-7372(03)00068-9.
Radiation was until recently the key and only modality for the routine treatment of locally advanced cervical carcinoma. However after years of studying multi-modality treatments as an alternative to radiation alone in randomized phase III trials, the standard treatment has changed to chemo-radiation based on cisplatin. Three recent meta-analyses have confirmed that cisplatin-based chemo-radiation adds an absolute 12% benefit in five-year survival over radiation therapy alone. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiation has not been of proven benefit, but when neoadjuvant chemotherapy is followed by surgery, an absolute increase of 15% in five-year survival over radiation alone is seen. This benefit in survival is comparable to that obtained with the current chemo-radiation schedules based on cisplatin. Despite these encouraging results there remains room for improvement as the five-year survival of patients treated with chemo-radiation ranges from nearly 80% in bulky IB tumours to only 25% in stage IVA disease. Other therapeutic approaches need to be fully evaluated including the use of chemo-radiation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy; the use of new drug combinations and the multi-modality combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery plus adjuvant chemo-radiation. Likewise, the addition of radiosensitizers to cisplatin, preoperative chemo-radiation and/or adjuvant chemotherapy may eventually improve the currents results of cisplatin-based chemo-radiation. Nevertheless, it is hard to foresee a dramatic increase in cure rate, even with the most optimal combination of cytotoxic drugs, surgery and radiation, and thus the testing of molecular targeted therapies against cervical cancer is a logical step to follow.
直到最近,放射治疗一直是局部晚期宫颈癌常规治疗的关键且唯一方式。然而,在随机III期试验中对多模式治疗作为单纯放疗替代方案进行多年研究后,标准治疗已转变为基于顺铂的放化疗。最近的三项荟萃分析证实,与单纯放疗相比,基于顺铂的放化疗在五年生存率方面绝对提高了12%。新辅助化疗后再进行放疗尚未被证实有获益,但新辅助化疗后进行手术时,与单纯放疗相比,五年生存率绝对提高了15%。这种生存获益与目前基于顺铂的放化疗方案所获得的获益相当。尽管有这些令人鼓舞的结果,但仍有改进空间,因为接受放化疗的患者五年生存率从大块IB期肿瘤患者的近80%到IVA期疾病患者的仅25%不等。其他治疗方法需要全面评估,包括新辅助化疗后使用放化疗;使用新的药物组合以及新辅助化疗后进行根治性手术加辅助放化疗的多模式联合。同样,在顺铂中添加放射增敏剂、术前放化疗和/或辅助化疗最终可能改善目前基于顺铂的放化疗结果。然而,即使使用最优化的细胞毒性药物、手术和放疗组合,也很难预见治愈率会大幅提高,因此测试针对宫颈癌的分子靶向治疗是合理的下一步。