Ice Gillian H
Department of Social Medicine, Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio, USA.
Coll Antropol. 2003 Jun;27(1):1-6.
Biological anthropologists have a strong tradition of studying growth and development and research on aging has been limited. This paper explores the past and current contribution of biological anthropologists to the field of aging through an examination of the American Journal of Physical Anthropology (AJPA) and the American Journal of Human Biology (AJHB). It is clear from this survey that biological anthropologists and human biologists have predominantly studied growth and developmental processes relative to aging. However, there is a trend of increasing interest in aging over time. In the AJHB, papers discussing chronic disease were predominant, followed by reproductive aging (19%), bone aging (15%) and body composition (10%). Within the AJPA, the majority of articles were in the field of human biology (43%) and bioarchaelogy (42%) with a lesser contribution from primatology (14%) and dermatogliphics (1%). Biological anthropologists still have great potential to make contributions to gerontology with our evolutionary and holistic perspectives and focus on cross-cultural research.
生物人类学家有着研究生长与发育的悠久传统,而关于衰老的研究一直较为有限。本文通过审视《美国体质人类学期刊》(AJPA)和《美国人类生物学杂志》(AJHB),探讨了生物人类学家在过去和当前对衰老领域的贡献。从这项调查中可以清楚地看出,生物人类学家和人类生物学家主要研究了与衰老相关的生长和发育过程。然而,随着时间的推移,对衰老的兴趣有增加的趋势。在《美国人类生物学杂志》中,讨论慢性病的论文占主导地位,其次是生殖衰老(19%)、骨骼衰老(15%)和身体成分(10%)。在《美国体质人类学期刊》中,大多数文章属于人类生物学领域(43%)和生物考古学领域(42%),灵长类学(14%)和皮纹学(1%)的贡献较小。生物人类学家凭借我们的进化和整体视角以及对跨文化研究的关注,仍有巨大潜力为老年学做出贡献。