Suppr超能文献

[在手术中未能救助处于危险中的人员]

[Failure to assist persons in danger in surgery].

作者信息

Soutoul J H

机构信息

Clinique Gynécologique Universitaire du Beffroi, Tours.

出版信息

Chirurgie. 1992;118(1-2):74-80; discussion 80-2.

PMID:1306430
Abstract

From 1949 to 1990, the authors gathered 120 files relating to 181 decisions, most of which are unpublished, and analyzed the teachings provided by case law about physicians faced with failure to assist persons in danger. This long series, extending over 30 years of application of article 63, paragraph 2, of the Penal Code--repressing failure to assist-, describes the most various conditions in which general practitioners or specialists were prosecuted, and most often charged and judged, by various criminal courts. In a number of cases, the appeals that were lodged enabled the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court to dram up Law rules taking primarily into account the strict application of the Penal Code article in cause, since its first decision in 1949. This article may involve surgeons as specialists, but also as "medical citizens" who are always regarded as having a particular mission of assistance, because of their vocation to rescue victims of accidents or patients in a pathological condition requiring assistance. The effectiveness of assistance is not considered in this legal requirement, which all representatives of the medical profession regard as a permanent sword of Damocles that must never be ignored whatever the circumstances and the practitioner's specialty.

摘要

从1949年至1990年,作者收集了与181项判决相关的120份档案,其中大部分未公开,并分析了判例法中关于医生面对未能救助处于危险中的人的相关教义。这一长达30年的系列档案涵盖了刑法典第63条第2款(惩治不作为)的适用情况,描述了全科医生或专科医生被不同刑事法庭起诉、多数情况下被指控并受审的各种情形。在一些案件中,所提起的上诉使最高法院刑事庭能够制定法律规则,自1949年首次判决以来,这些规则主要考虑对相关刑法条款的严格适用。该条款可能涉及作为专科医生的外科医生,也涉及作为“医疗公民”的外科医生,由于他们有救助事故受害者或处于需要救助的病理状况的患者的职责,他们总是被视为负有特殊的救助使命。这一法律要求并未考虑救助的有效性,医疗行业的所有代表都将其视为一把始终高悬的达摩克利斯之剑,无论在何种情况下以及从业者的专业领域如何,都绝不能忽视。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验