Allum J H, Honegger F
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
J Vestib Res. 1992 Winter;2(4):323-47.
The patterns of joint torques and movement strategies underlying human balance corrections were examined using a postural model. Two types of support-surface perturbation, dorsiflexion rotation (ROT) and rearward translation (TRANS), were employed. These two perturbations were adjusted to produce similar profiles of ankle dorsiflexion in order to obtain information on the role of lower leg proprioceptive inputs on triggering balance corrections. In addition, the dependence of balance control on head angular and linear accelerations was investigated by comparing the responses of normal and vestibularly deficient subjects under eyes-closed and eyes-open conditions. Differences in ROT and TRANS movement strategies were examined in three ways First, the amplitude and polarity of active joint torques were analysed. These were obtained by altering joint torques applied to a postural model until movements of the model accurately duplicated those of measured responses. Second, the pattern of body-segment angular movements depicted by stick figures moving in response to the computed joint torques was investigated. Third, the peak amplitude and patterns of crosscorrelations between joint torques were measured. Active ankle, knee, and hip joint torques computed for normal subjects rotated the body forward for ROT. In the case of TRANS, computed active torques in normals were of opposite polarity to those of ROT and reversed the forward motion of the body. Subjects with vestibular deficits had lower amplitude torques for ROT and failed to counter the platform rotation. Hip torques for TRANS in vestibular deficient subjects were of opposite polarity to those of normal subjects and resulted in excessive forward trunk rotation. Normally, neck torques acted to stabilize the head in space when trunk angular velocity peaked. Vestibular deficient subjects displayed head movements in response to ROT similar to those generated when neck torques were absent. For TRANS, these same subjects exhibited overcompensatory neck torques. Stick figures of normal responses indicated a stiffening of the body into a leg and a trunk-head link for ROT and a flexible multilink motion for TRANS. Likewise, normal response strategies, defined by using crosscorrelations of joint torques, differed for ROT and TRANS. All joint torque crosscorrelations were significant for TRANS. Neck torques led those of all other joint torques by 40 ms or more, and hip joint led ankle torques by 30 ms. Joint torque correlations for ROT were organised around hip and ankle torques without a major correlation to neck torques. Fundamental changes in all torque crosscorrelations occurred for vestibularly deficient subjects under both eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
使用姿势模型研究了人类平衡校正背后的关节扭矩模式和运动策略。采用了两种类型的支撑面扰动,即背屈旋转(ROT)和向后平移(TRANS)。对这两种扰动进行调整,以产生相似的踝背屈曲线,以便获取有关小腿本体感觉输入在触发平衡校正中的作用的信息。此外,通过比较正常受试者和前庭功能缺陷受试者在闭眼和睁眼条件下的反应,研究了平衡控制对头部角加速度和线加速度的依赖性。从三个方面研究了ROT和TRANS运动策略的差异。首先,分析了主动关节扭矩的幅度和极性。这些是通过改变应用于姿势模型的关节扭矩来获得的,直到模型的运动准确复制测量反应的运动。其次,研究了由响应计算出的关节扭矩而移动的人体模型所描绘的身体节段角运动模式。第三,测量了关节扭矩之间的峰值幅度和互相关模式。为正常受试者计算的主动踝、膝和髋关节扭矩使身体向前旋转以应对ROT。在TRANS的情况下,正常受试者计算出的主动扭矩与ROT的扭矩极性相反,并使身体的向前运动反向。前庭功能缺陷的受试者在ROT时扭矩幅度较低,无法抵消平台旋转。前庭功能缺陷受试者在TRANS时的髋关节扭矩与正常受试者的扭矩极性相反,导致躯干过度向前旋转。正常情况下,当躯干角速度达到峰值时,颈部扭矩起到稳定头部在空间中的作用。前庭功能缺陷的受试者在对ROT的反应中表现出的头部运动类似于没有颈部扭矩时产生的运动。对于TRANS,这些受试者表现出过度补偿的颈部扭矩。正常反应的人体模型表明,对于ROT,身体会僵化为腿部和躯干 - 头部连接,而对于TRANS,则是灵活的多连接运动。同样,通过使用关节扭矩的互相关定义的正常反应策略在ROT和TRANS之间也有所不同。对于TRANS,所有关节扭矩互相关都是显著的。颈部扭矩比所有其他关节扭矩提前40毫秒或更多,髋关节扭矩比踝关节扭矩提前30毫秒。对于ROT,关节扭矩相关性围绕髋关节和踝关节扭矩组织,与颈部扭矩没有主要相关性。在睁眼和闭眼条件下,前庭功能缺陷的受试者所有扭矩互相关都发生了根本性变化。(摘要截断于400字)