Salvesen K A, Bakketeig L S, Eik-nes S H, Undheim J O, Okland O
Department of Community Medicine and General Practice, University of Trondheim, Norway.
Lancet. 1992 Jan 11;339(8785):85-9. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90998-i.
Most fetuses in developed countries are exposed in utero to diagnostic ultrasound examination. Many pregnant women express concern about whether the procedure harms the fetus. Since most routine ultrasound examinations are done at weeks 16-22, when the fetal brain is developing rapidly, effects on neuronal migration are possible. We have sought an association between routine ultrasonography in utero and reading and writing skills among children in primary school. At the age of 8 or 9 years, children of women who had taken part in two randomised, controlled trials of routine ultrasonography during pregnancy were followed-up. The women had attended the clinics of 60 general practitioners in central Norway during 1979-81. The analysis of outcome was by intention to treat: 92% of the "screened" group had been exposed to ultrasound screening at weeks 16-22, and 95% of controls had not been so exposed, but there was some overlap. 2428 singletons were eligible for follow-up, and the school performance of 2011 children (83%) was assessed by their teachers on a scale of 1-7; the teachers were unaware of ultrasound exposure status. A subgroup of 603 children underwent specific tests for dyslexia. There were no statistically significant differences between children screened with ultrasound and controls in the teacher-reported school performance (scores for reading, spelling, arithmetic, or overall performance). Results from the dyslexia test sample showed no differences between screened children and controls in reading, spelling, and intelligence scores, or in discrepancy scores between intelligence and reading or spelling. The test results classified 21 of the 309 screened children (7% [95% confidence interval 3-10%]) and 26 of the 294 controls (9% [4-12%]) as dyslexic. The risk of having poor skills in reading and writing was no greater for children whose mothers had been offered routine ultrasonography than for those whose mothers had not been offered the procedure.
发达国家的大多数胎儿在子宫内都接受过诊断性超声检查。许多孕妇担心这种检查是否会伤害胎儿。由于大多数常规超声检查在孕16 - 22周进行,此时胎儿大脑正在快速发育,所以有可能对神经元迁移产生影响。我们一直在探寻子宫内常规超声检查与小学儿童读写能力之间的关联。在8或9岁时,对参与过两项孕期常规超声检查随机对照试验的女性所生子女进行了随访。这些女性在1979 - 1981年期间前往挪威中部60位全科医生的诊所就诊。结果分析采用意向性分析:“筛查”组中92%的孕妇在孕16 - 22周接受了超声筛查,95%的对照组孕妇未接受此类检查,但存在一些重叠情况。2428名单胎妊娠者符合随访条件,2011名儿童(83%)的学业表现由教师按1 - 7分制进行评估;教师并不知晓超声暴露情况。603名儿童的亚组接受了诵读困难的专项测试。在教师报告的学业表现(阅读、拼写、算术或总体表现得分)方面,接受超声筛查的儿童与对照组儿童之间无统计学显著差异。诵读困难测试样本的结果显示,筛查儿童与对照组儿童在阅读、拼写和智力得分方面,以及在智力与阅读或拼写之间的差异得分方面均无差异。测试结果将309名接受筛查儿童中的21名(7% [95%置信区间3 - 10%])和294名对照组儿童中的26名(9% [4 - 12%])归类为诵读困难。母亲接受过常规超声检查的儿童,其读写能力差的风险并不高于母亲未接受该检查的儿童。