Sala M, Braida D, Calcaterra P, Leone M P, Gori E
Institute of Pharmacology, Faculty of Mathematical, Physical and Natural Sciences, University of Milan, Italy.
Eur J Pharmacol. 1992 Jun 24;217(1):37-41. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(92)90508-2.
The conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm was used to study the reinforcing properties of etonitazene in comparison with those of morphine. Increasing doses of etonitazene (2.5-15 micrograms/kg i.p.) and morphine (1-80 mg/kg i.p.) induced a dose-dependent CPP. High doses of etonitazene (25-40 micrograms/kg) did not elicit CPP. In addition, these reinforcing properties were related to behavioral modifications such as analgesia, assessed with the tail-flick method, and increased catalepsy, evaluated by a scoring system. It is concluded that neither the strong behavioral effects induced by etonitazene nor tolerance to such effects account for the results. These findings are discussed with regard to the possibility that etonitazene could interfere with associative learning motivated by reward.
采用条件性位置偏爱(CPP)范式研究依托尼秦与吗啡相比的强化特性。递增剂量的依托尼秦(腹腔注射2.5 - 15微克/千克)和吗啡(腹腔注射1 - 80毫克/千克)诱导出剂量依赖性CPP。高剂量的依托尼秦(25 - 40微克/千克)未引发CPP。此外,这些强化特性与行为改变有关,如通过甩尾法评估的镇痛作用以及通过评分系统评估的僵住症增加。得出的结论是,依托尼秦诱导的强烈行为效应及其耐受性均不能解释这些结果。针对依托尼秦可能干扰由奖励驱动的联想学习的可能性对这些发现进行了讨论。