COLVIN J R
J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17(1):105-9. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.105.
Recently the lateral width of the cellulose microfibril has been estimated as 30 A rather than about 150 to 200 A, by extrapolation of data from model shadowing experiments. The difference was attributed to a layer of metal deposited during shadowing. However, direct photographs of the same microfibrils parallel and perpendicular to the direction of shadowing, of unshadowed portions of microfibrils compared with shadowed portions of the same microfibrils, of silver-stained unshadowed microfibrils, and of unshadowed, unstained segments of microfibrils give no evidence of a layer of metal of this thickness in material shadowed under normal conditions. Furthermore, the evidence for microfibril strands of about 35 A in width from negative-staining experiments is subject to a bias from the form of the filaments and from variable positive adsorption of phosphotungstic acid by cellulose. Consequently, the conclusion that the true lateral width of native cellulose microfibrils is about one-fifth of the presently accepted value is not yet justified by unequivocal direct experimental evidence.
最近,通过对模型投影实验数据的外推,纤维素微纤丝的横向宽度估计为30埃,而不是约150至200埃。这种差异归因于投影过程中沉积的一层金属。然而,对与投影方向平行和垂直的相同微纤丝的直接照片、微纤丝未投影部分与相同微纤丝投影部分的比较、银染的未投影微纤丝以及未投影、未染色的微纤丝片段进行观察,均未发现正常条件下投影材料中存在这种厚度的金属层。此外,负染色实验中宽度约为35埃的微纤丝束的证据,会受到细丝形状以及纤维素对磷钨酸可变正吸附的影响而产生偏差。因此,天然纤维素微纤丝的真实横向宽度约为目前公认值的五分之一这一结论,尚无明确的直接实验证据支持。