Kolettis G T, Stern S H
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Orthop Clin North Am. 1992 Oct;23(4):665-73.
Knee pain referable to the patellofemoral articulation is common in the general population. It remains a troubling problem for the orthopedic surgeon. Frequently, initial therapy, involving activity modification, anti-inflammatory medications, and isometric quadriceps strengthening, is successful in relieving symptoms. Surgical intervention is normally reserved for those patients with pain that is resistant to these modalities. Unfortunately, none of the various surgical options has proved to be totally dependable, durable, or reproducible. The results of isolated patellar and patellofemoral resurfacing procedures have been guarded. Patellar resurfacing appears to be most beneficial in younger patients with severe anterior knee pain. These individuals should be clearly warned that there is a relatively high likelihood that they will require additional surgical treatment or patellectomy at a later date. Fortunately, patellar resurfacing does not preclude patellectomy from being easily performed. Patellofemoral resurfacing, however, involves more overall involvement of the knee joint. This makes patellectomy less likely to be a successful salvage procedure. Despite our observations that knees with primary patellofemoral arthritis do not do as well after total knee replacement as those with tibio-femoral arthritis, this procedure remains the best treatment option. The durability and predictability of total knee arthroplasty are well documented. Its results far surpass those reported for isolated resurfacing procedures. With regard to patellar resurfacing as part of total knee arthroplasty, we recommend resurfacing all patellae. The literature, although not conclusive, lends support to this practice. Avoidance of metal-backed patellar components and special attention to technical details should decrease the complications associated with patellar resurfacing in future studies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
髌股关节相关的膝关节疼痛在普通人群中很常见。对骨科医生来说,这仍是一个棘手的问题。通常,初始治疗包括改变活动方式、使用抗炎药物以及进行股四头肌等长强化训练,这些方法往往能成功缓解症状。手术干预通常留给那些对这些治疗方式无效的疼痛患者。不幸的是,各种手术选择都未被证明是完全可靠、持久或可重复的。单纯的髌骨和髌股关节表面置换手术的结果并不理想。髌骨表面置换似乎对患有严重膝前疼痛的年轻患者最有益。应明确警告这些患者,他们日后很有可能需要额外的手术治疗或髌骨切除术。幸运的是,髌骨表面置换并不妨碍后期轻松进行髌骨切除术。然而,髌股关节表面置换涉及膝关节更广泛的部位。这使得髌骨切除术不太可能成为成功的挽救手术。尽管我们观察到,原发性髌股关节炎的膝关节在全膝关节置换后的效果不如胫股关节炎的膝关节,但该手术仍是最佳治疗选择。全膝关节置换术的耐用性和可预测性已有充分记录。其结果远远超过单独表面置换手术的报告结果。关于作为全膝关节置换术一部分的髌骨表面置换,我们建议对所有髌骨进行表面置换。文献虽无定论,但支持这种做法。在未来的研究中,避免使用金属背衬的髌骨组件并特别注意技术细节应能减少与髌骨表面置换相关的并发症。(摘要截选至250字)