Picard C, Gomez D, Roche A, Stöckle M, Saumtally S, Lefebvre P, Sabathié M
Département d'Anesthésie, Centre Hospitalier Saint-André, Bordeaux.
Cah Anesthesiol. 1992;40(5):321-32.
The authors compared two open randomized groups of patients undergoing surgery through general anaesthesia. Group 1 consisted of 54 patients ventilated by a Siemens 900 B ventilator in open circuit, and group 2, 56 patients ventilated by an ELSA de Gambro ventilator in a closed circuit. Comparative hour cost for nitrous oxide (N2O), oxygen (O2) and halogen gas, Enflurane, Isoflurane, was noted. All patients received the same regimen of anaesthesia and the two groups were identical in age, weight, surgery, respiratory volume and ventilation time. The evaluation of comparative hour cost included specific materials of close circuit ventilator: CO2 filter (Aridus), Lime. Were excluded maintenance and gas consumption expenditures before patient connected to the ventilator. The total hour cost (O2, N2O, specific materials for close circuit, without halogen gas) was 8.23 FF in closed circuit against 13.28 FF in open circuit, an economy of 38.27%. Hence, for oxygen, the hour cost was 0.70 FF in open circuit against 0.27 FF in closed circuit (gain of 65.3%). For nitrous oxide, the hour cost in open circuit was 12.50 FF against 2.44 FF in closed circuit (80.5%). For Isoflurane, the open circuit hour cost was 41.38 FF against 22.44 FF in closed circuit (47%). For Enflurane, the open circuit hour cost was 14.17 FF against 5.94 FF in closed circuit (58.1%). And, lastly for Enflurane, open circuit hour cost was 14.17 FF against 5.94 FF in close circuit, gain of 58.1%. These "modest" economy against those found in previous studies can be explained by the long-time duration of ventilation, saturating time in open circuit more or less long, depending on the physician, specific materials for closed circuit ventilation--lime, CO2 filter--in not taken into account, the hour cost of O2 + NO2 goes from 8.23 FF to 2.71 FF, and the gain against the close circuit becomes 79.6%: reducing hour cost by 5 times. In order to improve the effective cost of close circuit, the authors proposed: the use of closed circuit ventilation for more than 3 hours surgery, gas saturation in closed circuit after denitrogenation--which demands the use of halogen infjectors, and lime in containers cheaper than disposable cartridges. Respecting the above criteria, the total hour cost in close circuit fell to 4.90 FF, gain of 63% against open circuit. For O2 et N2O, the hour cost goes from 1.34 FF in close circuit to 13.28 FF in open circuit, 90% economy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
作者比较了两组接受全身麻醉手术的开放性随机分组患者。第一组由54例使用西门子900 B呼吸机进行开路通气的患者组成,第二组由56例使用甘布罗ELSA呼吸机进行闭路通气的患者组成。记录了氧化亚氮(N₂O)、氧气(O₂)和卤代气体安氟醚、异氟醚的每小时比较成本。所有患者接受相同的麻醉方案,两组在年龄、体重、手术、呼吸量和通气时间方面相同。比较每小时成本的评估包括闭路呼吸机的特定材料:二氧化碳过滤器(Aridus)、石灰。排除患者连接呼吸机前的维护和气体消耗支出。闭路的每小时总成本(O₂、N₂O、闭路特定材料,不含卤代气体)为8.23法郎,开路为13.28法郎,节省38.27%。因此,对于氧气,开路每小时成本为0.70法郎,闭路为0.27法郎(节省65.3%)。对于氧化亚氮,开路每小时成本为12.50法郎,闭路为2.44法郎(80.5%)。对于异氟醚,开路每小时成本为41.38法郎,闭路为22.44法郎(47%)。对于安氟醚,开路每小时成本为14.17法郎,闭路为5.94法郎(58.1%)。最后对于安氟醚,开路每小时成本为14.17法郎,闭路为5.94法郎,节省58.1%。与先前研究相比,这些“适度”的节省可解释为通气时间长、开路饱和时间或多或少取决于医生、未考虑闭路通气的特定材料——石灰、二氧化碳过滤器、O₂ + NO₂的每小时成本从8.23法郎降至2.71法郎,与闭路相比节省变为79.6%:每小时成本降低5倍。为了提高闭路的有效成本,作者提出:对手术时间超过3小时的患者使用闭路通气、脱氮后在闭路中进行气体饱和——这需要使用卤代注射器,以及使用比一次性药筒更便宜的容器中的石灰。遵循上述标准,闭路的每小时总成本降至4.90法郎,与开路相比节省63%。对于O₂和N₂O,每小时成本从闭路的1.34法郎升至开路的13.28法郎,节省90%。(摘要截选至250词)