Dunbar G C, Fuell D L
SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Reigate, Surrey, UK.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1992 Jun;6 Suppl 4:81-90. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199206004-00014.
A worldwide database was employed to assess the effect of paroxetine on symptoms of anxiety and agitation associated with depression. Data derived from the use of paroxetine (n = 2963), placebo (n = 554) and active control (n = 1151) in short-term clinical trials were compared. Paroxetine and active control were significantly better than placebo in reducing psychic anxiety. However, paroxetine was superior to active control from week 2 onwards. Both paroxetine and active control had a beneficial effect on somatic anxiety, but this effect was seen earlier with active control. Neither paroxetine nor active control caused emergent (new) anxiety symptoms. Paroxetine had a more robust effect in reducing baseline symptoms of agitation when compared with active control, while both therapies protected from emergent (new) agitation, when compared with placebo. There was no difference between the three groups in the spontaneously reported adverse events indicative of increased arousal. The use of major and minor tranquillizers in the paroxetine and active control groups was similar.
采用一个全球数据库来评估帕罗西汀对与抑郁症相关的焦虑和激越症状的影响。比较了短期临床试验中使用帕罗西汀(n = 2963)、安慰剂(n = 554)和活性对照(n = 1151)的数据。在减轻精神性焦虑方面,帕罗西汀和活性对照均显著优于安慰剂。然而,从第2周起,帕罗西汀优于活性对照。帕罗西汀和活性对照对躯体性焦虑均有有益作用,但活性对照的这种作用出现得更早。帕罗西汀和活性对照均未引起新的焦虑症状。与活性对照相比,帕罗西汀在减轻激越的基线症状方面效果更强,而与安慰剂相比,两种疗法均能预防新出现的激越。在自发报告的提示觉醒增加的不良事件方面,三组之间没有差异。帕罗西汀组和活性对照组中使用大剂量和小剂量镇静剂的情况相似。