Suppr超能文献

聚焦经颅磁刺激与强制选择任务中的反应偏差

Focal transcranial magnetic stimulation and response bias in a forced-choice task.

作者信息

Brasil-Neto J P, Pascual-Leone A, Valls-Solé J, Cohen L G, Hallett M

机构信息

Human Cortical Physiology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

出版信息

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Oct;55(10):964-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.10.964.

Abstract

The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation were studied on the performance of a warned, forced-choice response time task by normal adults. The task consisted of extension of the index finger in response to the click produced by the discharge of the magnetic coil (go-signal). The subjects were asked to choose the right or left finger only after the go-signal was delivered. Single magnetic stimuli were delivered to the prefrontal or motor area, and in the control situation, away from the head. Magnetic stimulation affected hand preference only when it was delivered to the motor area. With stimulation of this area, subjects more often chose the hand contralateral to the site stimulated with response times that were mainly less than 200 ms. With longer response times (between 200 and 1100 ms), magnetic stimulation had no effect on hand preference regardless of the site stimulated. Stimulation of prefrontal areas yielded results similar to the control situation. These results suggest that response bias in this paradigm is caused by an effect of magnetic stimulation on neural structures within, or closely related to, the motor areas of the brain. Although the response bias was clear and predictable, the subjects were unaware of its existence. It is possible to influence endogenous processes of movement preparation externally without disrupting the conscious perception of volition.

摘要

研究了经颅磁刺激对正常成年人在一项有提示的强制选择反应时间任务中的表现的影响。该任务包括在磁线圈放电产生的咔哒声(启动信号)出现时伸出食指。要求受试者仅在启动信号发出后选择右手或左手手指。将单个磁刺激施加到前额叶或运动区,在对照情况下,则远离头部。磁刺激仅在施加到运动区时才会影响手的偏好。刺激该区域时,受试者更常选择与受刺激部位对侧的手,反应时间主要小于200毫秒。对于较长的反应时间(200至1100毫秒之间),无论刺激部位如何,磁刺激对手的偏好均无影响。刺激前额叶区域产生的结果与对照情况相似。这些结果表明,该范式中的反应偏差是由磁刺激对大脑运动区内或与其密切相关的神经结构的影响引起的。尽管反应偏差清晰且可预测,但受试者并未意识到其存在。有可能在不干扰对意志的有意识感知的情况下,从外部影响运动准备的内源性过程。

相似文献

1
Focal transcranial magnetic stimulation and response bias in a forced-choice task.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Oct;55(10):964-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.10.964.
2
Cerebral dominance for action in the human brain: the selection of actions.
Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(2):105-13. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00105-6.
4
Modifying the cortical processing for motor preparation by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Sep;19(9):1556-73. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1556.
5
Transcranial magnetic stimulation can influence the selection of motor programmes.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990 Aug;53(8):705-7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.53.8.705.
6
Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex modulates response interference in a flanker task.
Neurosci Lett. 2009 Feb 27;451(3):261-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.12.052. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
7
Independent control of voluntary movements and associated anticipatory postural responses in a bimanual task.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Sep;116(9):2083-90. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.05.010.
8
Premovement facilitation of corticospinal excitability before simple and sequential movement.
Percept Mot Skills. 2010 Aug;111(1):129-40. doi: 10.2466/15.25.27.PMS.111.4.129-140.
9
Motor cortex involvement during choice reaction time: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study in man.
Brain Res. 1997 May 2;755(2):181-92. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(97)00095-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Sensorimotor faculties bias choice behavior.
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 28;16:1432996. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1432996. eCollection 2025.
2
A Transmissive Theory of Brain Function: Implications for Health, Disease, and Consciousness.
NeuroSci. 2022 Aug 9;3(3):440-456. doi: 10.3390/neurosci3030032. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Sensorimotor faculties bias perceptual decision-making.
bioRxiv. 2024 May 16:2024.05.14.594024. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.14.594024.
5
Dissociation of Centrally and Peripherally Induced Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Effects in Nonhuman Primates.
J Neurosci. 2023 Dec 13;43(50):8649-8662. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1016-23.2023.
6
Can static Rorschach stimuli perceived as in motion affect corticospinal excitability?
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 13;18(7):e0287866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287866. eCollection 2023.
7
Irrelevant insights make worldviews ring true.
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 8;12(1):2075. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05923-3.
9
Consciousness, decision making, and volition: freedom beyond chance and necessity.
Theory Biosci. 2022 Jun;141(2):125-140. doi: 10.1007/s12064-021-00346-6. Epub 2021 May 28.
10
Dual-hemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over primary motor cortex does not affect movement selection.
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 12;14(12):e0226103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226103. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
VISUAL SENSATIONS FROM THE ALTERNATING MAGNETIC FIELD.
Science. 1911 Jan 13;33(837):68-71. doi: 10.1126/science.33.837.68-a.
3
The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4.
4
Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1988 Aug;14(3):331-44. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.14.3.331.
6
Transcranial magnetic stimulation can influence the selection of motor programmes.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990 Aug;53(8):705-7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.53.8.705.
8
Attenuation in detection of somatosensory stimuli by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Oct;81(5):366-76. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(91)90026-t.
9
Effects of coil design on delivery of focal magnetic stimulation. Technical considerations.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990 Apr;75(4):350-7. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90113-x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验