相似文献
1
Chance-corrected sensitivity and specificity for three-zone diagnostic tests.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Sep;45(9):1035-9. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90124-6.
2
Sensitivity and specificity of clinical tests.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1991 Oct;96(4):556. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/96.4.556.
3
Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity.
BMJ. 1994 Jun 11;308(6943):1552. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6943.1552.
4
[Likelihood ratio and Fagan's nomogram: 2 basic tools for the rational use of clinical laboratory tests].
Rev Calid Asist. 2013 Nov-Dec;28(6):390-1. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
5
6
Test research versus diagnostic research.
Clin Chem. 2004 Mar;50(3):473-6. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.024752.
7
Sensitivity and specificity are not constant test characteristics.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1992 Apr;97(4):601. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/97.4.601.
8
Touching all the bases in diagnostic test assessment.
Am J Med. 1990 Mar;88(3):203-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90142-z.
9
[The concept of a standard of quality in clinical laboratory studies].
Klin Lab Diagn. 1997 Feb(2):5-12.
10
Sensitivity and specificity-like measures of the validity of a diagnostic test that are corrected for chance agreement.
Epidemiology. 1992 Mar;3(2):178-81. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199203000-00017.
引用本文的文献
1
Measurement of Uncertainty in Prediction of No-Reflow Phenomenon after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Systemic Immune Inflammation Index: The Gray Zone Approach.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 13;13(4):709. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040709.
Zotero 插件