Lightfoot G R
Department of Clinical Engineering, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, England.
Br J Audiol. 1992 Aug;26(4):217-27. doi: 10.3109/03005369209076640.
The audiological assessment of patients considered 'at risk' for an acoustic neuroma is problematic when the patient has a severe hearing loss. The utility of ABR rate-induced latency shift (RLS) measurements was investigated in 189 patients who had passed a conventional assessment and 31 patients with an acoustic neuroma. A test based on the RLS of wave V using rates of 11.1 s-1 and 88.8 s-1 had a sensitivity of 89.5% and a specificity of 90.8% when applied with a dual interpretive criterion which included the loss of wave V at the higher rate. This test was included in an ABR screening protocol which had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 97.9%. The RLS test requires no correction for age, sex, hearing loss or stimulus intensity and may be used in patients with severe hearing loss for whom other ABR tests are inappropriate.
对于被认为有听神经瘤“风险”的患者,当患者存在严重听力损失时,其听力学评估存在问题。在189例通过常规评估的患者和31例听神经瘤患者中,研究了听性脑干反应(ABR)率诱导潜伏期偏移(RLS)测量的效用。当应用包括较高刺激率下V波消失在内的双重解释标准时,基于11.1 s-1和88.8 s-1刺激率的V波RLS测试的敏感性为89.5%,特异性为90.8%。该测试被纳入ABR筛查方案,其敏感性为100%,特异性为97.9%。RLS测试无需对年龄、性别、听力损失或刺激强度进行校正,可用于其他ABR测试不适用的严重听力损失患者。