Murray J E, Hibbert M L, Heth S R, Letterie G S
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Dec;80(6):1053-5.
A laparoscopic technique of Pomeroy tubal ligation using endoloop sutures was compared with the conventional technique of laparoscopic tubal ligation with Silastic rings. Fifty-three patients selected from a population undergoing tubal ligation were randomized to either the Pomeroy (N = 28) or ring (N = 25) group. Mean (+/- standard deviation) operative time for the Pomeroy group was 27.39 +/- 5.95 minutes, with a range of 18-40; for the ring group, the time was 23.11 +/- 11.53 minutes, with a range of 12-58. These times were not statistically different. Operative complication were encountered only in the ring group and included two lacerations of the mesosalpinx. There were no technical or method failures over a follow-up interval of 12-18 months. Specimens confirmed tubal histology in all cases in the Pomeroy group. Laparoscopic Pomeroy tubal ligation using endoloop sutures was easily performed, comparable to laparoscopic application of Silastic rings, and provided a surgical specimen to confirm tubal histology. This aspect may represent a medicolegal advantage of documentation not available with other laparoscopic techniques of tubal ligation.
采用内套圈缝线进行腹腔镜下波默罗伊输卵管结扎术与采用硅橡胶环进行腹腔镜输卵管结扎术的传统技术进行了比较。从接受输卵管结扎术的人群中选取53例患者,随机分为波默罗伊组(N = 28)或环组(N = 25)。波默罗伊组的平均(±标准差)手术时间为27.39±5.95分钟,范围为18 - 40分钟;环组的手术时间为23.11±11.53分钟,范围为12 - 58分钟。这些时间在统计学上无差异。手术并发症仅出现在环组,包括2例输卵管系膜撕裂。在12 - 18个月的随访期内未出现技术或方法失败情况。波默罗伊组所有病例的标本均证实了输卵管组织学情况。采用内套圈缝线进行腹腔镜下波默罗伊输卵管结扎术操作简便,与腹腔镜应用硅橡胶环相当,并能提供手术标本以证实输卵管组织学情况。这一点可能代表了该方法在法医学上的优势,而其他腹腔镜输卵管结扎技术无法提供这样的记录。