Moher D, Cole C W, Hill G B
Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Loeb Medical Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Canada.
Eur J Vasc Surg. 1992 Nov;6(6):647-50. doi: 10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80844-8.
There have been several published definitions for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), however, it is not known how different definitions affect what is reported. This paper presents an evaluation of three definitions taken from the literature on (a) aneurysm frequency, (b) prevalence rate and (c) prevalence ratio from an ongoing case-control study evaluating whether male siblings of patients with known AAA have a higher prevalence of aneurysms compared to a control group. Depending on the definition used, the frequency of AAA could vary from a low of five to a high of 23; the prevalence of AAA in siblings could range from 2.1 to 18.8. Changing definitions alters the prevalence ratio (risk of disease) in both magnitude and direction. On the one hand, male sibling of affected patients are at approximately one and a half times (1.6) greater risk of having an AAA compared to controls, whereas using a different definition they are at less than half the risk (0.3).
关于腹主动脉瘤(AAA)已有多种已发表的定义,然而,尚不清楚不同的定义如何影响所报告的内容。本文对从文献中选取的三种定义进行了评估,这些定义分别来自一项正在进行的病例对照研究中的(a)动脉瘤发生率、(b)患病率和(c)患病率比,该研究旨在评估已知患有AAA的患者的男性同胞与对照组相比是否具有更高的动脉瘤患病率。根据所使用的定义,AAA的发生率可能低至5例,高至23例;同胞中AAA的患病率可能在2.1%至18.8%之间。改变定义会在大小和方向上改变患病率比(疾病风险)。一方面,与对照组相比,患病患者的男性同胞患AAA的风险大约高1.5倍(1.6),而使用不同的定义时,他们的风险不到一半(0.3)。