• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

It's time to challenge surgical dogma with evidence-based data.

作者信息

Jenkins Todd R

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;189(2):423-7. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00587-8.

DOI:10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00587-8
PMID:14520211
Abstract

Surgical training is an apprenticeship with surgical techniques passed from one physician to another. Often these techniques are based more on surgical dogma than scientific evidence. Despite surgical dogma to the contrary, electrocautery is the preferred technique for wound creation, and peritoneal closure has no significant advantage over nonclosure. No method of handling the subcutaneous tissue is clearly superior; however, suture closure appears to have some advantages in preventing wound disruption. Subcuticular suture closure results in less pain and better patient satisfaction, and it is more cost-effective than surgical staples. These surgical techniques, as well as many others, need to be subjected to rigorous, randomized prospective trials. It is incumbent on each physician to ensure that his or her surgical techniques are evidence based and not simply the result of adherence to surgical dogma.

摘要

相似文献

1
It's time to challenge surgical dogma with evidence-based data.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;189(2):423-7. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00587-8.
2
Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.剖宫产术中皮肤缝合的技术与材料
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD003577. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003577.pub2.
3
Choosing abdominal incision and closure techniques: a review.
J Reprod Med. 2004 Aug;49(8):662-70.
4
Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.对比 III 类肥胖女性剖宫产术中使用缝线与皮内缝合的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;218(4):451.e1-451.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
5
Suture Products and Techniques: What to Use, Where, and Why.缝合产品与技术:用什么、何处用以及为何用。
Dermatol Surg. 2015 Oct;41 Suppl 10:S187-200. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000492.
6
Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.剖宫产术后皮肤缝合使用缝线与吻合器的Meta分析
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;212(5):621.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.020. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
7
Randomized controlled trial comparing subcuticular absorbable suture with conventional interrupted suture for wound closure at elective operation of colon cancer.在结肠癌择期手术中,比较皮下可吸收缝线与传统间断缝线用于伤口闭合的随机对照试验。
Surgery. 2014 Mar;155(3):486-92. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.016. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
8
Comparing cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and conventional subcuticular skin sutures for maxillofacial incisions--a prospective randomized trial considering closure time, wound morbidity, and cosmetic outcome.比较氰基丙烯酸酯组织粘合剂与传统皮下皮肤缝线用于颌面切口——一项考虑闭合时间、伤口发病率和美容效果的前瞻性随机试验。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;71(12):2152.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.08.029.
9
Systematic review and meta-analysis of electrocautery versus scalpel for surgical skin incisions.电刀与手术刀用于外科切口的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Surg. 2012 Aug;204(2):216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.09.032. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
10
MONOCRYL and DERMABOND vs Staples in Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Through a Lateral Skin Incision: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using a Patient-Centered Assessment Tool.经外侧皮肤切口行全髋关节置换术时,爱惜康单股可吸收缝合线和皮肤粘合剂与金属缝合钉的比较:一项使用以患者为中心评估工具的随机对照试验
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Aug;32(8):2431-2435. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.042. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Wound complication among different skin closure techniques in the emergency cesarean section: a randomized control trial.急诊剖宫产不同皮肤缝合技术的伤口并发症:一项随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020 Jan;63(1):27-34. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2020.63.1.27. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
2
Abdominal binders after laparotomy: review of the literature and French survey of policies.剖腹术后使用腹带:文献回顾与法国政策调查。
Hernia. 2014 Aug;18(4):501-6. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1264-2. Epub 2014 May 17.
3
[Approaches to the abdominal cavity and closure of the abdominal wall].
[进入腹腔及腹壁闭合的方法]
Chirurg. 2011 Dec;82(12):1067-74. doi: 10.1007/s00104-011-2114-8.
4
Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures - design of a multi-centre randomised trial to evaluate abdominal closure techniques INSECT-trial [ISRCTN24023541].间断或连续可缓慢吸收缝线——一项评估腹部闭合技术的多中心随机试验的设计:INSECT试验[ISRCTN24023541]
BMC Surg. 2005 Mar 8;5:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-5-3.