Rinehart John, Keville Lisa, Neidhart Jeff, Wong Lucas, DiNunno Lucio, Kinney Patricia, Aberle Marie, Tadlock Laura, Cloud Gretchen
University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, 35294-3300, USA.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2003 Oct;26(5):448-58. doi: 10.1097/01.coc.0000027268.23258.7D.
Based on preclinical studies, the authors undertook a pilot study to determine the hematologic and biologic effects of pretreatment with dexamethasone (Dex) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in patients receiving carboplatin and ifosfamide. Patients (n = 28) with metastatic solid tumors were randomized to receive pretreatment with Dex or GM-CSF or no pretreatment prior to courses 1 or 2 of carboplatin and ifosfamide. No alteration in dose of chemotherapy was allowed between course 1 and 2. Alterations of hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity and selected biologic parameters were compared between courses 1 and 2. Patients without any pretreatment demonstrated worsening hematologic toxicity in course 2 compared to course 1. In contrast, Dex pretreatment reduced hematopoietic toxicity and improved the absolute granulocyte count (AGC) and platelet count recovery times. For example, course 1 versus course 2 (with Dex pretreatment): AGC nadir (mm3) 153 versus 549 (p = 0.07), days AGC <500/mm3 7.8 versus 4.0 (p = 0.10), days to AGC recovery >1,500/mm3, 26 versus 22 (p = 0.034). Overall comparison between all five cohorts by analyses of variance demonstrated that intervention with Dex improved multiple hematopoietic toxicities, including AGC nadir (p = 0.015), and recovery times to AGC >1,500/mm3 (p = 0.07) and platelet count to >100,000/mm3 (p = 0.05). GM-CSF pretreatment did not worsen hematopoietic parameters after course 2 compared to course 1. Expected biologic effects of Dex and GM-CSF treatment were observed. Patients demonstrated an overall response rate of 32%, 1 complete response, and 8 partial responses. In patients with cancer, pretreatment with Dex or GM-CSF may significantly decrease the hematopoietic toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents.
基于临床前研究,作者开展了一项初步研究,以确定在接受卡铂和异环磷酰胺治疗的患者中,地塞米松(Dex)或粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)预处理的血液学和生物学效应。患有转移性实体瘤的患者(n = 28)被随机分为三组,分别在卡铂和异环磷酰胺的第1或第2疗程之前接受Dex预处理、GM-CSF预处理或不进行预处理。第1疗程和第2疗程之间不允许改变化疗剂量。比较第1疗程和第2疗程之间血液学和非血液学毒性以及选定的生物学参数的变化。未进行任何预处理的患者在第2疗程时血液学毒性比第1疗程恶化。相比之下,Dex预处理降低了造血毒性,改善了绝对粒细胞计数(AGC)和血小板计数恢复时间。例如,第1疗程与第2疗程(采用Dex预处理):AGC最低点(每立方毫米)153对549(p = 0.07),AGC<500/立方毫米的天数7.8对4.0(p = 0.10),AGC恢复至>1500/立方毫米的天数,26对22(p = 0.034)。通过方差分析对所有五个队列进行总体比较表明,Dex干预改善了多种造血毒性,包括AGC最低点(p = 0.015),以及AGC恢复至>1500/立方毫米的时间(p = 0.07)和血小板计数恢复至>100,000/立方毫米的时间(p = 0.05)。与第1疗程相比,GM-CSF预处理在第2疗程后并未使造血参数恶化。观察到了Dex和GM-CSF治疗预期的生物学效应。患者的总体缓解率为32%,1例完全缓解,8例部分缓解。在癌症患者中,Dex或GM-CSF预处理可能会显著降低化疗药物对造血系统的毒性。