Suppr超能文献

Reusable versus disposable instruments in tonsillectomy: a comparative study of outcomes.

作者信息

Maheshwar A, De M, Browning S T

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, Glamorgan.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2003 Sep;57(7):579-83.

Abstract

Tonsillectomy, traditionally performed using reusable instruments (RIs), has recently been performed using disposable instruments (DIs), to prevent the theoretical risk of spreading new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Following this, there have been concerns of increased risk of complications, especially haemorrhage. We audited our hospital's complication rates of 100 tonsillectomies performed using RI and 100 using DIs. We analysed the overall complication rates and the postoperative haemorrhage rates. and compared them with the broader groups of RIs versus DIs. We also compared patients who did not have diathermy with those who did have diathermy. The overall complication rate was 6% with RIs and 33% with DIs and the haemorrhage rate was 1% and 12%, respectively. With DIs, these rates were significantly higher in the diathermy subgroup. We believe this is the first study to look at the complications due to DIs.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验