Mellado J M, Calmet J, Olona M, Giné J, Saurí A
Institut de Diagnòstic per la Imatge, Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII, Carrer Doctor Mallafrè Guasch 4, 43007 Tarragona, Spain.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004 May;12(3):217-24. doi: 10.1007/s00167-003-0431-2. Epub 2003 Oct 3.
We evaluated the diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears using both quantitative parameters and nonquantitative imaging findings. MRI examinations were retrospectively evaluated in a group of patients with arthroscopically confirmed complete ACL tear and in a control group with arthroscopically confirmed intact ACL. We evaluated multiple MRI features to compare their sensitivity and specificity for detecting ACL tears. Particular emphasis is put on the evaluation of three different quantitative parameters, including a simplified method for measuring the ACL angle. With a threshold value of 45 degrees the ACL angle reached a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for detecting ACL tears. With a threshold value of 0 degrees the Blumensaat angle had a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 98%. Finally, a threshold value of 115 degrees gave the posterior cruciate ligament angle a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 82%. Discontinuity was found to be the most useful of the ACL abnormalities. Of the secondary findings anterior tibial displacement was the best predictor of ligamentous injury. However, ACL abnormalities and secondary findings, alone or combined, failed to surpass the diagnostic value of the ACL angle for predicting ACL tears. Quantitative parameters are thus good predictors of ACL tears and may increase the overall sensitivity and specificity of MRI. The ACL angle may be confidently measured in a single MRI section and can be considered to be the most reliable quantitative parameter for detecting ACL tears.
我们使用定量参数和非定量影像学表现评估了磁共振成像(MRI)对预测前交叉韧带(ACL)撕裂的诊断效用。对一组经关节镜证实为完全ACL撕裂的患者和一组经关节镜证实ACL完整的对照组患者的MRI检查进行了回顾性评估。我们评估了多个MRI特征,以比较它们检测ACL撕裂的敏感性和特异性。特别强调了对三个不同定量参数的评估,包括一种测量ACL角度的简化方法。当阈值为45度时,ACL角度检测ACL撕裂的敏感性和特异性达到100%。当阈值为0度时,布卢门萨特角的敏感性为90%,特异性为98%。最后,当阈值为115度时,后交叉韧带角的敏感性为70%,特异性为82%。发现连续性中断是ACL异常中最有用的表现。在次要表现中,胫骨前移是韧带损伤的最佳预测指标。然而,单独或联合的ACL异常和次要表现未能超过ACL角度对预测ACL撕裂的诊断价值。因此,定量参数是ACL撕裂的良好预测指标,可能会提高MRI的总体敏感性和特异性。ACL角度可以在单个MRI层面中可靠地测量,并且可以被认为是检测ACL撕裂最可靠的定量参数。