Partin Alan W, Brawer Michael K, Bartsch Georg, Horninger Wolfgang, Taneja Samir S, Lepor Herbert, Babaian Richard, Childs Stacy J, Stamey Thomas, Fritsche Herbert A, Sokoll Lori, Chan Daniel W, Thiel Robert P, Cheli Carol D
James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
J Urol. 2003 Nov;170(5):1787-91. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000092695.55705.dd.
Complexed (c) prostate specific antigen (PSA) has been shown to enhance specificity for prostate cancer (CaP) detection over total PSA (tPSA), although a large multi-institutional prospective evaluation was required to confirm these findings. We compared the clinical performance of cPSA with tPSA as a first line test for CaP detection and secondarily to determine if PSA ratios, namely percent free PSA (fPSA) and percent cPSA, can provide further enhancement in diagnostic performance over cPSA or tPSA.
Consecutive men scheduled for initial biopsy of the prostate were enrolled prospectively at each of 7 university centers and community based urology practices. Serum was collected and tested with the Immuno 1 (Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, New York), tPSA and cPSA, and Access (Beckman, Inc., San Diego, California) fPSA and tPSA methods.
A total of 831 patients were evaluated, of whom 313 (37.5%) were diagnosed with CaP. ROC curve analysis performed from the results of all samples and those within the clinically relevant cPSA ranges of 1.5 to 3.2, 1.5 to 5.1, 1.5 to 8.3 and 3.2 to 8.3 ng/ml (tPSA 2 to 4, 2 to 6, 2 to 10 and 4 to 10 ng/ml, respectively) indicated a significant improvement in the AUC ROC curve for cPSA compared with tPSA (p < or =0.001). Using cutoff points that provide a sensitivity of 80% to 95% for CaP detection within the 1.5 to 8.3 ng/ml cPSA range cPSA provided a statistically significant enhancement in specificity over tPSA of 6.2% to 7.9%. Within the cPSA range of 1.5 to 3.2 ng/ml using a cutoff point of 2.5 ng/ml for tPSA and 2.2 ng/ml for cPSA provided a specificity of 21.2% and 35%, respectively, and 85% sensitivity for CaP detection. PSA ratios provided no further enhancement in specificity over cPSA within these ranges.
The use of cPSA as a single test provided improved specificity over tPSA. Percent fPSA and percent cPSA offered little to no additional benefit in the differentiation of benign and malignant disease at clinically relevant cPSA concentrations.
复合前列腺特异性抗原(cPSA)已显示出比总前列腺特异性抗原(tPSA)在检测前列腺癌(CaP)方面具有更高的特异性,尽管需要进行大规模多机构前瞻性评估来证实这些发现。我们比较了cPSA与tPSA作为CaP检测一线检测方法的临床性能,并其次确定前列腺特异性抗原比值,即游离前列腺特异性抗原百分比(fPSA)和复合前列腺特异性抗原百分比,是否能在诊断性能上比cPSA或tPSA有进一步提高。
在7个大学中心和社区泌尿外科诊所前瞻性纳入计划进行前列腺初次活检的连续男性患者。收集血清并用Immuno 1(拜耳诊断公司,纽约塔里敦)检测tPSA和cPSA,以及用Access(贝克曼公司,加利福尼亚圣地亚哥)检测fPSA和tPSA。
共评估了831例患者,其中313例(37.5%)被诊断为CaP。根据所有样本以及临床相关cPSA范围1.5至3.2、1.5至5.1、1.5至8.3和3.2至8.3 ng/ml(tPSA分别为2至4、2至6、2至10和4至10 ng/ml)的结果进行的ROC曲线分析表明,与tPSA相比,cPSA的AUC ROC曲线有显著改善(p≤0.001)。在1.5至8.3 ng/ml的cPSA范围内使用能提供80%至95%CaP检测灵敏度的临界值时,cPSA在特异性方面比tPSA有6.2%至7.9%的统计学显著提高。在1.5至3.2 ng/ml的cPSA范围内,使用tPSA临界值2.5 ng/ml和cPSA临界值2.2 ng/ml时,特异性分别为21.2%和35%,CaP检测灵敏度为85%。在这些范围内,前列腺特异性抗原比值在特异性方面比cPSA没有进一步提高。
将cPSA作为单一检测方法比tPSA具有更高的特异性。在临床相关的cPSA浓度下,fPSA百分比和cPSA百分比在区分良性和恶性疾病方面几乎没有额外益处。