Ferrari Federico, Trevisan Marco, Capri Ettore
Istituto di Chimica Agraria ed Ambientale-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29100 Piacenza, Italy.
J Environ Qual. 2003 Sep-Oct;32(5):1623-33. doi: 10.2134/jeq2003.1623.
Pesticides can volatilize into the atmosphere, which affects the air quality. The ability to predict pesticide volatilization is an essential tool for human risk and environmental assessment. Even though there are several mathematical models to assess and predict the fate of pesticides in different compartments of the environment, there is no reliable model to predict volatilization. The objectives of this study were to evaluate pesticide volatilization under agricultural conditions using malathion [ O,O-dimethyl-S-(1,2-dicarbethoxyethyl)-dithiophosphate], ethoprophos (O-ethyl S,S-dipropylphosphorodithioate), and procymidone [N-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-1,2-dimethylcyclopropane-1,2-dicarboximide] as test compounds and to evaluate the ability of the Pesticide Leaching Model (PELMO) to calculate the predicted environmental concentrations of pesticides in air under field conditions. The volatilization rate of procymidone, malathion, and ethoprophos was determined in a field study during two different periods (December 1998 and September 1999) using the Theoretical Profile Shape (TPS) method. The experiments were performed on bare silty soil in the Bologna province, Italy. Residues in the air were continuously monitored for 2 to 3 wk after the pesticide applications. The amount of pesticide volatilized was 16, 5, and 11% in December 1998 and 41, 23, and 19% in September 1999 for procymidone, malathion, and ethoprophos, respectively. In both these experiments, the PELMO simulations of the concentration of ethoprophos and procymidone were in good agreement with the measured data (factor +/- 1.1 on average). The volatilization of malathion was underestimated by a factor of 30 on average. These results suggest that volatilization described by PELMO may be reliable for volatile substances, but PELMO may underpredict volatilization for less-volatile substances.
农药会挥发到大气中,从而影响空气质量。预测农药挥发的能力是进行人体风险和环境评估的重要工具。尽管有多种数学模型可用于评估和预测农药在不同环境介质中的归宿,但尚无可靠的模型来预测农药挥发。本研究的目的是使用马拉硫磷[O,O-二甲基-S-(1,2-二乙氧基羰基乙基)-二硫代磷酸酯]、灭线磷(O-乙基 S,S-二丙基二硫代磷酸酯)和腐霉利[N-(3,5-二氯苯基)-1,2-二甲基环丙烷-1,2-二甲酰亚胺]作为测试化合物,评估农业条件下的农药挥发情况,并评估农药淋溶模型(PELMO)计算田间条件下空气中农药预测环境浓度的能力。在1998年12月和1999年9月这两个不同时期的田间研究中,采用理论剖面形状(TPS)方法测定了腐霉利、马拉硫磷和灭线磷的挥发速率。实验在意大利博洛尼亚省的裸粉质土壤上进行。施药后持续2至3周对空气中的残留量进行监测。1998年12月,腐霉利、马拉硫磷和灭线磷的农药挥发量分别为16%、5%和11%;1999年9月分别为41%、23%和19%。在这两个实验中,PELMO对灭线磷和腐霉利浓度的模拟结果与实测数据吻合良好(平均因子±1.1)。马拉硫磷的挥发量平均被低估了30倍。这些结果表明,PELMO描述的挥发情况对于挥发性物质可能是可靠的,但对于挥发性较小的物质,PELMO可能会低估其挥发量。