Moore Martha M, Honma Masamitsu, Clements Julie, Bolcsfoldi George, Cifone Maria, Delongchamp Robert, Fellows Michael, Gollapudi Bhaskar, Jenkinson Peter, Kirby Paul, Kirchner Stephan, Muster Wolfgang, Myhr Brian, O'Donovan Michael, Oliver Jo, Omori Takashi, Ouldelhkim Marie-Claude, Pant Kamala, Preston Robert, Riach Colin, San Richard, Stankowski Leon F, Thakur Ajit, Wakuri Shinobu, Yoshimura Isao
National Center for Toxicological Research, Food and Drug Administration, HFT-120, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR, USA.
Mutat Res. 2003 Oct 7;540(2):127-40. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2003.07.003.
The Mouse Lymphoma Assay (MLA) Workgroup of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Tests (IWGT) met on June 28th and 29th, 2002, in Plymouth, England. This meeting of the MLA group was devoted to discussing the criteria for assay acceptance and appropriate approaches to data evaluation. Prior to the meeting, the group conducted an extensive analysis of data from both the microwell and soft agar versions of the assay. For the establishment of criteria for assay acceptance, 10 laboratories (6 using the microwell method and 4 using soft agar) provided data on their background mutant frequencies, plating efficiencies of the negative/vehicle control, cell suspension growth, and positive control mutant frequencies. Using the distribution curves generated from this data, the Workgroup reached consensus on the range of values that should be used to determine whether an individual experiment is acceptable. In order to establish appropriate approaches for data evaluation, the group used a number of statistical methods to evaluate approximately 400 experimental data sets from 10 laboratories entered into a database created for the earlier MLA Workshop held in New Orleans [Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 40 (2002) 292]. While the Workgroup could not, during this meeting, make a final recommendation for the evaluation of data, a general strategy was developed and the Workgroup members agreed to evaluate this new proposed approach using their own laboratory data. This evaluation should lead to a consensus global approach for data evaluation in the near future.
遗传毒性测试国际研讨会(IWGT)的小鼠淋巴瘤试验(MLA)工作组于2002年6月28日和29日在英国普利茅斯举行会议。MLA小组的这次会议专门讨论了试验验收标准和数据评估的适当方法。会议召开前,该小组对试验微孔板法和软琼脂法的数据进行了广泛分析。为了制定试验验收标准,10个实验室(6个使用微孔板法,4个使用软琼脂法)提供了其背景突变频率、阴性/溶剂对照的铺板效率、细胞悬浮液生长情况以及阳性对照突变频率的数据。利用这些数据生成的分布曲线,工作组就用于确定单个实验是否可接受的值范围达成了共识。为了建立适当的数据评估方法,该小组使用了多种统计方法来评估来自10个实验室的约400个实验数据集,这些数据已录入为在新奥尔良举行的早期MLA研讨会创建的数据库中[《环境与分子突变》40(2002)292]。虽然工作组在本次会议期间无法就数据评估提出最终建议,但已制定了一个总体策略,工作组成员同意使用各自实验室的数据对这一新提出的方法进行评估。这种评估应能在不久的将来形成一种全球通用的数据评估方法。