Tunnacliffe A, Lapinski J
Institute of Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QT, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Oct 29;358(1438):1755-71. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1214.
In 1702, Van Leeuwenhoek was the first to describe the phenomenon of anhydrobiosis in a species of bdelloid rotifer, Philodina roseola. It is the purpose of this review to examine what has been learned since then about the extreme desiccation tolerance in rotifers and how this compares with our understanding of anhydrobiosis in other organisms. Remarkably, much of what is known today about the requirements for successful anhydrobiosis, and the degree of biostability conferred by the dry state, was already determined in principle by the time of Spallanzani in the late 18th century. Most modern research on anhydrobiosis has emphasized the importance of the non-reducing disaccharides trehalose and sucrose, one or other sugar being present at high concentrations during desiccation of anhydrobiotic nematodes, brine shrimp cysts, bakers' yeast, resurrection plants and plant seeds. These sugars are proposed to act as water replacement molecules, and as thermodynamic and kinetic stabilizers of biomolecules and membranes. In apparent contradiction of the prevailing models, recent experiments from our laboratory show that bdelloid rotifers undergo anhydrobiosis without producing trehalose or any analogous molecule. This has prompted us to critically re-examine the association of disaccharides with anhydrobiosis in the literature. Surprisingly, current hypotheses are based almost entirely on in vitro data: there is very limited information which is more than simply correlative in the literature on living systems. In many species, disaccharide accumulation occurs at approximately the same time as desiccation tolerance is acquired. However, several studies indicate that these sugars are not sufficient for anhydrobiosis; furthermore, there is no conclusive evidence, through mutagenesis or functional knockout experiments, for example, that sugars are necessary for anhydrobiosis. Indeed, some plant seeds and micro-organisms, like the rotifer, exhibit excellent desiccation tolerance in the absence of high intracellular sugar concentrations. Accordingly, it seems appropriate to call for a re-evaluation of our understanding of anhydrobiosis and to embark on new experimental programmes to determine the key molecular mechanisms involved.
1702年,范·列文虎克首次描述了一种蛭形轮虫——玫瑰旋轮虫(Philodina roseola)中的隐生现象。本综述的目的是考察自那时以来我们对轮虫极端耐旱性的了解,以及这与我们对其他生物隐生现象的理解有何不同。值得注意的是,如今我们所知道的关于成功隐生的要求以及干燥状态赋予的生物稳定性程度,在18世纪末斯帕兰扎尼时代原则上就已经确定了。大多数关于隐生现象的现代研究都强调了非还原性二糖海藻糖和蔗糖的重要性,在隐生性线虫、卤虫囊肿、面包酵母、复苏植物和植物种子干燥过程中,这两种糖中的一种或另一种会以高浓度存在。这些糖被认为可作为水替代分子,以及生物分子和膜的热力学和动力学稳定剂。与主流模型明显矛盾的是,我们实验室最近的实验表明,蛭形轮虫在不产生海藻糖或任何类似分子的情况下经历隐生现象。这促使我们批判性地重新审视文献中二糖与隐生现象的关联。令人惊讶的是,目前的假设几乎完全基于体外数据:关于活体系统的文献中,仅有非常有限的信息不仅仅是相关性的。在许多物种中,二糖积累大约与获得耐旱性同时发生。然而,多项研究表明这些糖对于隐生现象并不充分;此外,例如通过诱变或功能敲除实验,没有确凿证据表明糖对于隐生现象是必需的。实际上,一些植物种子和微生物,如轮虫,在细胞内无糖高浓度的情况下仍表现出优异的耐旱性。因此,似乎有必要重新评估我们对隐生现象的理解,并开展新的实验项目来确定其中涉及的关键分子机制。