Bradberry Sally M
National Poisons Information Service (Birmingham Centre), City Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Toxicol Rev. 2003;22(1):13-27. doi: 10.2165/00139709-200322010-00003.
Methaemoglobin is formed by oxidation of ferrous (FeII) haem to the ferric (FeIII) state and the mechanisms by which this occurs are complex. Most cases are due to one of three processes. Firstly, direct oxidation of ferrohaemoglobin, which involves the transfer of electrons from ferrous haem to the oxidising compound. This mechanism proceeds most readily in the absence of oxygen. Secondly, indirect oxidation, a process of co-oxidation which requires haemoglobin-bound oxygen and is involved, for example, in nitrite-induced methaemoglobinaemia. Thirdly, biotransformation of a chemical to an active intermediate that initiates methaemoglobin formation by a variety of mechanisms. This is the means by which most aromatic compounds, such as amino- and nitro-derivatives of benzene, produce methaemoglobin. Methaemoglobinaemia is an uncommon occupational occurrence. Aromatic compounds are responsible for most cases, their lipophilic nature and volatility facilitating absorption during dermal and inhalational exposure, the principal routes implicated in the workplace. Methaemoglobinaemia presents clinically with symptoms and signs of tissue hypoxia. Concentrations around 80% are life-threatening. Features of toxicity may develop over hours or even days when exposure, whether by inhalation or repeated skin contact, is to relatively low concentrations of inducing chemical(s). Not all features observed in patients with methaemoglobinaemia are due to methaemoglobin formation. For example, the intravascular haemolysis caused by oxidising chemicals such as chlorates poses more risk to life than the methaemoglobinaemia that such chemicals induce. If an occupational history is taken, the diagnosis of methaemoglobinaemia should be relatively straightforward. In addition, two clinical observations may help: firstly, the victim is often less unwell than one would expect from the severity of 'cyanosis' and, secondly, the 'cyanosis' is unresponsive to oxygen therapy. Pulse oximetry is unreliable in the presence of methaemoglobinaemia. Arterial blood gas analysis is mandatory in severe poisoning and reveals normal partial pressures of oxygen (pO2) and carbon dioxide (pCO2,), a normal 'calculated' haemoglobin oxygen saturation, an increased methaemoglobin concentration and possibly a metabolic acidosis. Following decontamination, high-flow oxygen should be given to maximise oxygen carriage by remaining ferrous haem. No controlled trial of the efficacy of methylene blue has been performed but clinical experience suggests that methylene blue can increase the rate of methaemoglobin conversion to haemoglobin some 6-fold. Patients with features and/or methaemoglobin concentrations of 30-50%, should be administered methylene blue 1-2 mg/kg/bodyweight intravenously (the dose depending on the severity of the features), whereas those with methaemoglobin concentrations exceeding 50% should be given methylene blue 2 mg/kg intravenously. Symptomatic improvement usually occurs within 30 minutes and a second dose of methylene blue will be required in only very severe cases or if there is evidence of ongoing methaemoglobin formation. Methylene blue is less effective or ineffective in the presence of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency since its antidotal action is dependent on nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP+). In addition, methylene blue is most effective in intact erythrocytes; efficacy is reduced in the presence of haemolysis. Moreover, in the presence of haemolysis, high dose methylene blue (20-30 mg/kg) can itself initiate methaemoglobin formation. Supplemental antioxidants such as ascorbic acid (vitamin C), N-acetylcysteine and tocopherol (vitamin E) have been used as adjuvants or alternatives to methylene blue with no confirmed benefit. Exchange transfusion may have a role in the management of severe haemolysis or in G-6-P-D deficiency associated with life-threatening methaemoglobinaemia where methylene blue is relatively contraindicated.
高铁血红蛋白是由亚铁(FeII)血红素氧化为高铁(FeIII)状态形成的,其发生机制很复杂。大多数病例是由以下三个过程之一引起的。首先,亚铁血红蛋白的直接氧化,这涉及电子从亚铁血红素转移到氧化化合物。这种机制在无氧条件下最容易发生。其次,间接氧化,一种共氧化过程,需要与血红蛋白结合的氧气,例如参与亚硝酸盐诱导的高铁血红蛋白血症。第三,化学物质生物转化为活性中间体,通过多种机制引发高铁血红蛋白形成。这是大多数芳香族化合物,如苯的氨基和硝基衍生物产生高铁血红蛋白的方式。高铁血红蛋白血症是一种罕见的职业性疾病。大多数病例由芳香族化合物引起,它们的亲脂性和挥发性便于在皮肤接触和吸入暴露时被吸收,这是工作场所涉及的主要途径。高铁血红蛋白血症临床上表现为组织缺氧的症状和体征。浓度约80%时会危及生命。当通过吸入或反复皮肤接触暴露于相对低浓度的诱导化学物质时,毒性特征可能在数小时甚至数天内出现。并非所有高铁血红蛋白血症患者观察到的特征都归因于高铁血红蛋白的形成。例如,氯酸盐等氧化化学物质引起的血管内溶血对生命造成的风险比这些化学物质诱导的高铁血红蛋白血症更大。如果询问职业史,高铁血红蛋白血症的诊断应该相对简单。此外,两项临床观察可能有所帮助:首先,受害者通常比根据“发绀”严重程度预期的情况症状较轻;其次,“发绀”对氧疗无反应。存在高铁血红蛋白血症时脉搏血氧饱和度测定不可靠。严重中毒时必须进行动脉血气分析,结果显示氧分压(pO2)和二氧化碳分压(pCO2)正常,“计算得出”的血红蛋白氧饱和度正常,高铁血红蛋白浓度升高,可能还有代谢性酸中毒。去污后,应给予高流量氧气,以最大限度地提高剩余亚铁血红素携带氧气的能力。尚未进行关于亚甲蓝疗效的对照试验,但临床经验表明亚甲蓝可使高铁血红蛋白转化为血红蛋白的速率提高约6倍。高铁血红蛋白浓度为30%至50%且有相关特征的患者,应静脉注射亚甲蓝1至2毫克/千克体重(剂量取决于特征的严重程度),而高铁血红蛋白浓度超过50%的患者应静脉注射亚甲蓝2毫克/千克。症状通常在30分钟内改善,仅在非常严重的病例或有持续高铁血红蛋白形成证据时才需要第二剂亚甲蓝。在葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶缺乏的情况下,亚甲蓝效果较差或无效,因为其解毒作用依赖于烟酰胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸磷酸(NADP+)。此外,亚甲蓝在完整红细胞中最有效;溶血时效果会降低。此外,在溶血情况下,高剂量亚甲蓝(20至30毫克/千克)本身可引发高铁血红蛋白形成。补充抗氧化剂如抗坏血酸(维生素C)、N-乙酰半胱氨酸和生育酚(维生素E)已被用作亚甲蓝的辅助剂或替代品,但未证实有好处。换血疗法可能在严重溶血的管理中起作用,或在与危及生命的高铁血红蛋白血症相关的葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶缺乏症中起作用,此时亚甲蓝相对禁忌。