Giardino Nicholas D, Jensen Mark P, Turner Judith A, Ehde Dawn M, Cardenas Diana D
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Box 356490, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195-6490, USA.
Pain. 2003 Nov;106(1-2):19-25. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00226-4.
Catastrophizing, or exaggerating the negative consequences of a situation, is associated with higher pain intensity, emotional distress, and functional disability among persons with chronic pain. According to the 'communal coping' model, catastrophizing in persons with pain may function as a social communication directed toward obtaining social proximity, support, or assistance. We tested the hypothesis, based on this model, that social factors would moderate the association between catastrophizing and sensory and affective pain. Seventy-four persons with a spinal cord injury and chronic pain completed measures of catastrophizing, solicitousness, depression, and sensory and affective pain before beginning a randomized controlled medication trial. Catastrophizing was significantly associated with solicitousness and pain reports. The association between catastrophizing and sensory pain scores was stronger for those who lived with a spouse or partner than for those who lived with someone else. In addition, there was a stronger association between catastrophizing and affective pain for those who reported greater solicitousness in their relationship. The results provide partial support for the communal coping model of catastrophizing.
灾难化思维,即夸大某种情况的负面后果,与慢性疼痛患者的更高疼痛强度、情绪困扰和功能障碍有关。根据“共同应对”模型,疼痛患者的灾难化思维可能起到一种社会沟通的作用,旨在获得社会亲近、支持或帮助。基于此模型,我们检验了社会因素会调节灾难化思维与感觉性疼痛和情感性疼痛之间关联的假设。74名脊髓损伤并患有慢性疼痛的患者在开始一项随机对照药物试验之前,完成了灾难化思维、关怀、抑郁以及感觉性疼痛和情感性疼痛的测量。灾难化思维与关怀及疼痛报告显著相关。与和其他人一起生活的患者相比,与配偶或伴侣一起生活的患者,其灾难化思维与感觉性疼痛评分之间的关联更强。此外,在关系中报告有更多关怀的患者,其灾难化思维与情感性疼痛之间的关联更强。这些结果为灾难化思维的共同应对模型提供了部分支持。