Cain Ed, Ackroyd-Stolarz Stacy, Alexiadis Peggy, Murray Daphne
Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, 1496 Bedford Highway, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B4A 1E5.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2003 Oct-Dec;7(4):458-65. doi: 10.1080/312703002193.
Emergency medical services (EMS) personnel frequently encounter patients who refuse transport after being treated for a hypoglycemic episode. The outcomes of most of these patients are unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcomes of patients treated and not transported for hypoglycemia and identify criteria that could be used to identify patients who did not require transport to hospital.
This was a prospective, observational study involving all adult (>15 years) hypoglycemic patients (blood glucose less than 4 mmol/L by glucometer) attended to by the EMS system in the Halifax Metropolitan area in the province of Nova Scotia during a ten-month interval.
There were 220 calls for adult patients with hypoglycemia. Of the 75 calls that resulted in transport, there were 17 further hypoglycemic episodes requiring a repeat call for an ambulance (22.7%) and three recurrences (4%). Of the 145 calls that did not result in transport, 40 further episodes of hypoglycemia (27.6%) and three recurrences (2%) were reported. These differences were not statistically significant (p=0.43 and 0.33, respectively). There was also no statistically significant difference in the intervals between hypoglycemic episodes for patients transported (51.1 days +/-65) compared with patients not transported for their previous hypogylcemic episode (40.7 days +/-53.5) (p=0.6). Of the 47 calls entered in the study, there were seven repeat calls for hypoglycemia (15%) and one recurrence (2.1%). The majority of patients did not follow up with their physician.
Repeat episodes of hypoglycemia are common; however, recurrences within 48 hours are not. Admission to hospital is rarely required. There appears to be no difference in the incidence of recurrences and repeat episodes of hypoglycemia between transported and nontransported insulin-dependent patients, regardless of age. Given the high incidence of repeat episodes, paramedics and physicians need to emphasize the importance of follow-up.
紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员经常遇到低血糖发作治疗后拒绝转运的患者。这些患者大多数的结局尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定接受治疗但未因低血糖而转运的患者的结局,并确定可用于识别无需转运至医院的患者的标准。
这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,涉及新斯科舍省哈利法克斯都会区EMS系统在十个月期间接诊的所有成年(>15岁)低血糖患者(血糖仪检测血糖低于4 mmol/L)。
共接到220例成年低血糖患者的呼叫。在导致转运的75例呼叫中,有17例进一步发生低血糖发作,需要再次呼叫救护车(22.7%),3例复发(4%)。在未导致转运的145例呼叫中,报告了40例进一步的低血糖发作(27.6%)和3例复发(2%)。这些差异无统计学意义(分别为p = 0.43和0.33)。与因先前低血糖发作未转运的患者相比,转运患者低血糖发作间隔时间(51.1天±65)也无统计学显著差异(40.7天±53.5)(p = 0.6)。在纳入研究的47例呼叫中,有7例因低血糖再次呼叫(15%),1例复发(2.1%)。大多数患者未对其医生进行随访。
低血糖复发很常见;然而,48小时内复发并不常见。很少需要住院治疗。无论年龄大小,转运和未转运的胰岛素依赖型患者低血糖复发和再次发作的发生率似乎没有差异。鉴于再次发作的高发生率,护理人员和医生需要强调随访的重要性。