Suppr超能文献

衡量不同医疗环境下信息采集及时性的差异:对数据质量的影响。

Measuring disparities in information capture timeliness across healthcare settings: effects on data quality.

作者信息

Lorence Daniel

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Administration & School of Information Science and Technology, The Pennsylvania State University, P.O. Box 1154, State College, Pennsylvania 16801, USA.

出版信息

J Med Syst. 2003 Oct;27(5):425-33. doi: 10.1023/a:1025655721518.

Abstract

The emergence of evidence-based medicine in the United States has created an industry-wide environment where the quality of data maintained by healthcare organizations is becoming a critical factor in the delivery of medical care. Such a transition necessitates a corresponding need for consistent data collection and maintenance methods. In this study results of a national survey of health information managers were used to assess prevalence of a standard data quality practice, the adoption of policies related to timeliness of data capture. Findings from this survey show that, on a national level, only a slight majority of respondents indicated adoption of timeliness policies. About 61% of respondents indicate they have policies and procedures addressing data timeliness, although persistent patterns of nonadoption were found. We examine how the timeliness of data collection might serve as part of an overall data collection strategy that managers can employ to improve the quality of their information.

摘要

循证医学在美国的出现营造了一种全行业环境,在这种环境下,医疗保健机构所维护的数据质量正成为医疗服务中的一个关键因素。这种转变相应地需要一致的数据收集和维护方法。在本研究中,一项针对健康信息管理人员的全国性调查结果被用于评估一种标准数据质量实践的普及程度,即与数据捕获及时性相关政策的采用情况。该调查结果显示,在全国范围内,只有略超半数的受访者表示采用了及时性政策。约61%的受访者表示他们有处理数据及时性的政策和程序,不过仍发现了持续的未采用模式。我们研究了数据收集的及时性如何能够作为管理人员可用来提高其信息质量的整体数据收集策略的一部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验