Suppr超能文献

皮下注射磺达肝癸钠与静脉注射普通肝素用于肺栓塞初始治疗的比较

Subcutaneous fondaparinux versus intravenous unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism.

作者信息

Büller H R, Davidson B L, Decousus H, Gallus A, Gent M, Piovella F, Prins M H, Raskob G, van den Berg-Segers A E M, Cariou R, Leeuwenkamp O, Lensing A W A

机构信息

Academic Medical Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, F4-211, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2003 Oct 30;349(18):1695-702. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035451.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The standard initial treatment of hemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism is intravenous unfractionated heparin, requiring laboratory monitoring and hospitalization.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, open-label trial involving 2213 patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism to compare the efficacy and safety of the synthetic antithrombotic agent fondaparinux with those of unfractionated heparin and to document noninferiority in terms of efficacy. Patients received either fondaparinux (5.0, 7.5, or 10.0 mg in patients weighing less than 50, 50 to 100, or more than 100 kg, respectively) subcutaneously once daily or a continuous intravenous infusion of unfractionated heparin (ratio of the activated partial-thromboplastin time to a control value, 1.5 to 2.5), both given for at least five days and until the use of vitamin K antagonists resulted in an international normalized ratio above 2.0. The primary efficacy outcome was the three-month incidence of the composite end point of symptomatic, recurrent pulmonary embolism (nonfatal or fatal) and new or recurrent deep-vein thrombosis.

RESULTS

Forty-two of the 1103 patients randomly assigned to receive fondaparinux (3.8 percent) had recurrent thromboembolic events, as compared with 56 of the 1110 patients randomly assigned to receive unfractionated heparin (5.0 percent), for an absolute difference of -1.2 percent in favor of fondaparinux (95 percent confidence interval, -3.0 to 0.5). Major bleeding occurred in 1.3 percent of the patients treated with fondaparinux and 1.1 percent of those treated with unfractionated heparin. Mortality rates at three months were similar in the two groups. Of the patients in the fondaparinux group, 14.5 percent received the drug in part on an outpatient basis.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily, subcutaneous administration of fondaparinux without monitoring is at least as effective and is as safe as adjusted-dose, intravenous administration of unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of hemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism.

摘要

背景

血流动力学稳定的肺栓塞患者的标准初始治疗是静脉注射普通肝素,这需要实验室监测和住院治疗。

方法

我们进行了一项随机、开放标签试验,纳入2213例急性症状性肺栓塞患者,比较合成抗血栓药物磺达肝癸钠与普通肝素的疗效和安全性,并证明在疗效方面不劣于普通肝素。患者分别接受皮下注射磺达肝癸钠(体重小于50、50至100或大于100 kg的患者分别为5.0、7.5或10.0 mg),每日一次,或持续静脉输注普通肝素(活化部分凝血活酶时间与对照值之比为1.5至2.5),两者均给药至少5天,直至使用维生素K拮抗剂导致国际标准化比值高于2.0。主要疗效结局是有症状的、复发性肺栓塞(非致命或致命)以及新的或复发性深静脉血栓形成的复合终点的三个月发生率。

结果

随机分配接受磺达肝癸钠治疗的1103例患者中有42例(3.8%)发生复发性血栓栓塞事件,而随机分配接受普通肝素治疗的1110例患者中有56例(5.0%)发生,有利于磺达肝癸钠的绝对差异为-1.2%(95%置信区间,-3.0至0.5)。接受磺达肝癸钠治疗的患者中有1.3%发生大出血,接受普通肝素治疗的患者中有1.1%发生大出血。两组三个月时的死亡率相似。磺达肝癸钠组中有14.5%的患者部分时间在门诊接受该药物治疗。

结论

在血流动力学稳定的肺栓塞患者的初始治疗中,每日一次皮下注射无需监测的磺达肝癸钠至少与调整剂量静脉注射普通肝素一样有效且安全。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验