Suppr超能文献

淋巴管内皮细胞表型和功能的内在调节与微环境调节

Intrinsic versus microenvironmental regulation of lymphatic endothelial cell phenotype and function.

作者信息

Veikkola Tanja, Lohela Marja, Ikenberg Kristian, Mäkinen Taija, Korff Thomas, Saaristo Anne, Petrova Tatania, Jeltsch Michael, Augustin Hellmut G, Alitalo Kari

机构信息

Molecular/Cancer Biology Laboratory and Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Biomedicum Helsinki, Haartman Institute and Helsinki University Central Hospital, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

FASEB J. 2003 Nov;17(14):2006-13. doi: 10.1096/fj.03-0179com.

Abstract

Vascular endothelial cells are characterized by a high degree of functional and phenotypic plasticity, which is controlled both by their pericellular microenvironment and their intracellular gene expression programs. To gain further insight into the mechanisms regulating the endothelial cell phenotype, we have compared the responses of lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) and blood vascular endothelial cells (BECs) to vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs). VEGFR-3-specific signals are sufficient for LEC but not BEC proliferation, as shown by the ability of the specific ligand VEGF-C156S to stimulate cell cycle entry only in LECs. On the other hand, we found that VEGFR-3 stimulation did not induce LEC cell shape changes typical of VEGFR-2-stimulated LECs, indicating receptor-specific differences in the cytoskeletal responses. Genes induced via VEGFR-2 also differed between BECs and LECs: angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) was induced via VEGFR-2 in BECs and LECs, but the smooth muscle cell (SMC) chemoattractant BMP-2 was induced only in BECs. Both BECs and LECs were able to promote SMC chemotaxis, but contact with SMCs led to down-regulation of VEGFR-3 expression in BECs in a 3-dimensional coculture system. This was consistent with the finding that VEGFR-3 is down-regulated in vivo at sites of endothelial cell-pericyte/smooth muscle cell contacts. Collectively, these data show intrinsic cell-specific differences of BEC and LEC responses to VEGFs and identify a pericellular regulatory mechanism for VEGFR-3 down-regulation in endothelial cells.

摘要

血管内皮细胞具有高度的功能和表型可塑性,这受到其细胞周围微环境和细胞内基因表达程序的共同控制。为了更深入地了解调节内皮细胞表型的机制,我们比较了淋巴管内皮细胞(LECs)和血管内皮细胞(BECs)对血管内皮生长因子(VEGFs)的反应。如特异性配体VEGF-C156S仅能刺激LECs进入细胞周期这一能力所示,VEGFR-3特异性信号足以促进LECs而非BECs的增殖。另一方面,我们发现VEGFR-3刺激并未诱导出VEGFR-2刺激的LECs典型的细胞形态变化,这表明在细胞骨架反应中存在受体特异性差异。通过VEGFR-2诱导的基因在BECs和LECs之间也有所不同:血管生成素-2(Ang-2)在BECs和LECs中均通过VEGFR-2诱导产生,但平滑肌细胞(SMC)趋化因子BMP-2仅在BECs中诱导产生。BECs和LECs均能够促进SMC趋化,但在三维共培养系统中,与SMCs接触会导致BECs中VEGFR-3表达下调。这与VEGFR-3在体内内皮细胞与周细胞/平滑肌细胞接触部位下调的发现一致。总体而言,这些数据显示了BECs和LECs对VEGFs反应的内在细胞特异性差异,并确定了内皮细胞中VEGFR-3下调的细胞周围调节机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验