Goldberg Alexander, Zinder Oren, Zdorovyak Alexander, Diamond Eric, Lischinsky Sophie, Gruberg Luis, Markiewicz Walter, Beyar Rafael, Aronson Doron
Department of Cardiology, Rambam Medical Center and Rappaport Medical School, Haifa, Israel.
Am Heart J. 2003 Nov;146(5):819-23. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00407-1.
Systemic markers of inflammation increase after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The rise in inflammatory markers after PCI is frequently attributed to the inflammatory stimulus associated with coronary artery injury during balloon inflation and coronary stent implantation. The aim of this study was the determine whether diagnostic coronary angiography performed in patients with stable angina triggers a systemic inflammatory response.
We prospectively studied patients with chronic stable angina undergoing either coronary angiography (n = 13) or coronary angiography followed by PCI (n = 13). Peripheral blood samples were obtained before and 24 hours, 48 hours, and 4 weeks after the procedure and analyzed for C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). Patients with periprocedural myocardial necrosis were excluded.
There was a significant increase in CRP levels at 24 and 48 hours in both the coronary angiography (P <.05) and PCI (P <.01) groups. IL-6 levels peaked at 24 hours in both the coronary angiography (median, 2.5-9.5 pg/mL; P =.01) and PCI (median, 3.0-8.2 pg/mL; P <.005) groups. At 4 weeks, both CRP and IL-6 returned to baseline levels. TNF-alpha levels were unchanged with either coronary angiography or PCI. The magnitude of the rise of CRP and IL-6 levels was not significantly different between the groups. There was a fair correlation between baseline and peak postprocedural levels of CRP (r = 0.67, P =.008) and IL-6 (r = 0.48, P =.016).
Uncomplicated diagnostic coronary angiography triggers a systemic inflammatory response in patients with stable angina. The contribution of coronary angiography should be considered in interpreting the significance of the systemic inflammatory response observed after PCI.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后炎症的全身标志物会升高。PCI后炎症标志物的升高通常归因于球囊扩张和冠状动脉支架植入过程中与冠状动脉损伤相关的炎症刺激。本研究的目的是确定在稳定型心绞痛患者中进行的诊断性冠状动脉造影是否会引发全身炎症反应。
我们前瞻性地研究了接受冠状动脉造影(n = 13)或冠状动脉造影后行PCI(n = 13)的慢性稳定型心绞痛患者。在手术前、术后24小时、48小时和4周采集外周血样本,分析C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)。排除围手术期心肌坏死的患者。
冠状动脉造影组(P <.05)和PCI组(P <.01)在术后24小时和48小时CRP水平均显著升高。冠状动脉造影组(中位数,2.5 - 9.5 pg/mL;P =.01)和PCI组(中位数,3.0 - 8.2 pg/mL;P <.005)的IL-6水平在术后24小时达到峰值。在4周时,CRP和IL-6均恢复到基线水平。冠状动脉造影或PCI后TNF-α水平均未改变。两组间CRP和IL-6水平升高的幅度无显著差异。术后CRP基线水平与峰值水平(r = 0.67,P =.008)以及IL-6基线水平与峰值水平(r = 0.48,P =.016)之间存在较好的相关性。
单纯的诊断性冠状动脉造影会在稳定型心绞痛患者中引发全身炎症反应。在解释PCI后观察到的全身炎症反应的意义时,应考虑冠状动脉造影的作用。