Grabow Theodore S, Tella Prabhav K, Raja Srinivasa N
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
Clin J Pain. 2003 Nov-Dec;19(6):371-83. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200311000-00005.
The purpose of this investigation is to assess the evidence for efficacy of SCS in the management of pain in patients with CRPS.
Electronic databases such as Medline and Cochrane Library were queried using key words such as "spinal cord stimulation," "reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD)," and "complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)."
Relevant published randomized controlled trials (RCT), cohort studies, case-control studies, case series, and case reports that described SCS as the primary treatment modality for patients with CRPS were eligible for inclusion.
Data extracted from qualified studies were summarized in sections of methodology, demographics, SCS equipment, primary and secondary outcomes, and complications.
Thirteen studies using the primary search strategy and 7 studies from their reference lists were considered. Five of these 20 studies were discarded. One RCT, 2 prospective observational, and 12 retrospective observational studies were eventually considered. The methodological quality of all studies was poor except for the single RCT study.
Although limited in quality and quantity, available evidence from the examined literature suggests that SCS is effective in the management of pain in patients with CRPS (grade B/C). Clinically useful information extracted from the available studies is very limited in guiding clinicians in the rational use of SCS for pain management in CRPS patients. Future attempts to investigate the efficacy of SCS in CRPS patients should involve methodologically robust designs such as randomized studies that have sufficient power.
本研究旨在评估脊髓刺激(SCS)治疗复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)患者疼痛的疗效证据。
使用“脊髓刺激”、“反射性交感神经营养不良(RSD)”和“复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)”等关键词查询电子数据库,如Medline和Cochrane图书馆。
将描述SCS作为CRPS患者主要治疗方式的相关已发表随机对照试验(RCT)、队列研究、病例对照研究、病例系列和病例报告纳入研究。
从符合条件的研究中提取的数据在方法学、人口统计学、SCS设备、主要和次要结局以及并发症等部分进行总结。
通过初步检索策略检索到13项研究,并从其参考文献列表中筛选出7项研究。这20项研究中有5项被排除。最终纳入1项RCT、2项前瞻性观察性研究和12项回顾性观察性研究。除单项RCT研究外所有研究的方法学质量均较差。
尽管质量和数量有限,但现有文献证据表明SCS对CRPS患者的疼痛管理有效(B/C级)。从现有研究中提取的临床有用信息在指导临床医生合理使用SCS治疗CRPS患者疼痛方面非常有限。未来研究SCS治疗CRPS患者疗效的尝试应采用方法学严谨的设计,如具有足够效力的随机研究。