Sofue Ayako, Kaneoke Yoshiki, Kakigi Ryusuke
Department of Integrative Physiology, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Japan.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2003 Nov;20(3):158-67. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10138.
Humans have several mechanisms for the visual perception of motion, including one that is luminance-based (first-order) and another that is luminance-independent (second-order). Recent psychophysical studies have suggested that significant interaction occurs between these two neural processes. We investigated whether such interactions are represented as neural activity measured by magnetoencephalography (MEG). The second-order motion of a drifting sinusoidal grating, which is defined by the speed of the dot motion, did not generate a response. Apparent motion (AM) of the square area, defined by the speed of randomly moving dots, evoked a magnetic response whose latency and amplitude changed with the distance that the area moved (a second-order characteristic), though the response properties were significantly different from those for the first-order AM. AM, defined by both first- and second-order attributes, evoked an MEG response and the latencies and the amplitudes were distributed between those for the first- and second-order motions. The cortical source of the response was estimated to be around MT+. The results show a distinct difference in the neural processing of the second-order motion that cannot be explained by the difference in visibility, and they indicate that the interaction of the neural processes underlying first- and second-order motion detection occurs before the MEG response. Our study provides the first physiological evidence of a neural interaction between the two types of early motion detection.
人类拥有多种用于视觉运动感知的机制,包括一种基于亮度的(一阶)机制和另一种与亮度无关的(二阶)机制。最近的心理物理学研究表明,这两种神经过程之间存在显著的相互作用。我们研究了这种相互作用是否表现为通过脑磁图(MEG)测量的神经活动。由点运动速度定义的漂移正弦光栅的二阶运动并未产生响应。由随机移动点的速度定义的方形区域的表观运动(AM)诱发了一种磁响应,其潜伏期和幅度随该区域移动的距离而变化(一种二阶特征),尽管其响应特性与一阶AM的响应特性有显著差异。由一阶和二阶属性共同定义的AM诱发了MEG响应,其潜伏期和幅度分布在一阶和二阶运动的潜伏期和幅度之间。估计响应的皮质源在MT + 附近。结果表明,二阶运动的神经处理存在明显差异,这无法用可见度的差异来解释,并且表明一阶和二阶运动检测背后的神经过程的相互作用发生在MEG响应之前。我们的研究提供了两种早期运动检测类型之间神经相互作用的首个生理学证据。