Critical comments threaten to open libel floodgate for physics archive.
作者信息
Giles Jim
出版信息
Nature. 2003 Nov 6;426(6962):7. doi: 10.1038/426007b.
DOI:10.1038/426007b
PMID:14603281
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Critical comments threaten to open libel floodgate for physics archive.
Nature. 2003 Nov 6;426(6962):7. doi: 10.1038/426007b.
2
Defamation, online.
Nature. 2003 Nov 6;426(6962):1. doi: 10.1038/426001b.
3
Preprint server seeks way to halt plagiarists.
Nature. 2003 Nov 6;426(6962):7. doi: 10.1038/426007a.
4
Witnesses to research wrongdoing.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Dec;7(5):3-14. doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.5.3.
5
Whistles blow in vain on bad practice in German research.
Nature. 2003 Nov 20;426(6964):218. doi: 10.1038/426218b.
6
Plagiarism of online material may be proven using the Internet Archive Wayback Machine (archive.org).
Med Hypotheses. 2009 Dec;73(6):875. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.049. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
7
Online archive must serve authors as well as publishers.
Nature. 1999 Sep 30;401(6752):423. doi: 10.1038/46659.
8
Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
Nature. 2005 Jul 7;436(7047):24. doi: 10.1038/436024d.
9
Open sesame.
Nature. 2010 Apr 8;464(7290):813. doi: 10.1038/464813a.
10
Turkish physicists face accusations of plagiarism.
Nature. 2007 Sep 6;449(7158):8. doi: 10.1038/449008b.
Zotero 插件