O'Brien Christopher J, Lauer Christopher S, Fredricks Susanne, Clifford Anthony R, McNeil Edward B, Bagia Jai S, Koulmandas Christina
Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, Royal Prince Alfred Medical Centre, 100 Carillon Avenue, 100 Carillon Avenue, Newtown, NSW 2042, Australia.
Head Neck. 2003 Nov;25(11):937-45. doi: 10.1002/hed.10324.
Previous studies have demonstrated that tumor thickness might influence prognosis in oral cancer, but the significant point at which outcome changes has varied from 1.5 mm to 6 mm. The clinical relevance of thickness remains unclear, and a reproducible prognostic "breakpoint" needs to be defined.
Tumor thickness was measured in 145 oral cavity squamous cancers, clinically staged T1 (n = 62) or T2 (n = 83). Clinical and pathologic data were collected prospectively between 1988 and 2000, but thickness was measured on paraffin sections for this study. Minimum follow-up was 2 years, and thickness was correlated with local control, cervical node involvement, and survival. Patients with clinically positive nodes (n = 21) were not excluded. Overall, 55 patients had pathologic node involvement at some time in their disease.
Median tumor thickness was 6.2 mm, and there was little variation between sites: tongue, 6.4 mm; floor of mouth, 6.6 mm; and other sites, 5.7 mm. Median thickness for T1 tumors was 4.3 mm, significantly less than the T2 group, 8 mm (p <.01). Median thickness also varied significantly for tumors with associated nodal disease (8.5 mm) and without nodal disease (5.8 mm) (p <.01). Prognosis changed significantly at a cutoff of 4 mm with local control, nodal disease, and survival rates of 91%, 8%, and 100%, respectively, for tumors <4 mm compared with 84%, 48%, and 74% for those 4 mm or more thick (p <.01). Subgrouping greater than and less than 3 mm and 5 mm also showed a difference but with poorer discrimination. Thickness and pathologic nodal involvement were highly significant independent prognostic factors.
Tumor thickness is a highly significant, objectively measurable prognostic factor in early stage oral cancers. There is a need to standardize techniques of measurement to allow a multi-institutional study to be carried out. This will facilitate the development of strategies aimed at improving the outcome of higher risk patients.
既往研究表明,肿瘤厚度可能会影响口腔癌的预后,但预后发生变化的关键厚度范围在1.5毫米至6毫米之间。厚度的临床相关性仍不明确,需要定义一个可重复的预后“断点”。
对145例口腔鳞状癌进行肿瘤厚度测量,临床分期为T1(n = 62)或T2(n = 83)。在1988年至2000年期间前瞻性收集临床和病理数据,但本研究在石蜡切片上测量厚度。最短随访时间为2年,厚度与局部控制、颈部淋巴结受累情况及生存率相关。临床淋巴结阳性患者(n = 21)未被排除。总体而言,55例患者在病程中的某个时间出现病理淋巴结受累。
肿瘤厚度中位数为6.2毫米,各部位之间差异不大:舌部为6.4毫米;口底为6.6毫米;其他部位为5.7毫米。T1肿瘤的厚度中位数为4.3毫米,显著低于T2组的8毫米(p <.01)。伴有淋巴结疾病的肿瘤厚度中位数(8.5毫米)与无淋巴结疾病的肿瘤厚度中位数(5.8毫米)也有显著差异(p <.01)。在4毫米的临界值处,预后发生显著变化,厚度小于4毫米的肿瘤局部控制率、淋巴结疾病发生率和生存率分别为91%、8%和100%,而厚度为4毫米或更厚的肿瘤分别为84%、48%和74%(p <.01)。将厚度分为大于和小于3毫米以及5毫米进行亚组分析也显示出差异,但区分度较差。厚度和病理淋巴结受累是高度显著的独立预后因素。
肿瘤厚度是早期口腔癌中一个高度显著、可客观测量的预后因素。需要规范测量技术,以便开展多机构研究。这将有助于制定旨在改善高风险患者预后的策略。