Suppr超能文献

西澳大利亚地区腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎的12个月回顾:某些患者是否仍需经验性使用万古霉素?

A 12-month review of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis in Western Australia: is empiric vancomycin still indicated for some patients?

作者信息

Kan George W, Thomas Mark A B, Heath Christopher H

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Perit Dial Int. 2003 Sep-Oct;23(5):465-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) guidelines recommend empiric therapy with cefazolin and ceftazidime for peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis. Empiric cefazolin therapy may have diminishing efficacy because of emerging methicillin resistance in gram-positive bacteria (GPB). Western Australia also has large numbers of Aboriginal and isolated regional patients, where giving these antimicrobials can be impractical.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate, based on local antimicrobial resistance patterns, the feasibility of following ISPD guidelines in Western Australia and to identify any subgroups of PD peritonitis patients that may benefit from alternative empiric intraperitoneal antibiotics (e.g., vancomycin).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of all PD peritonitis episodes in Western Australia from 1 February 2000 to 31 January 2001.

SETTING

Three adult tertiary referral university hospitals and their PD patients in metropolitan Perth and regional Western Australia.

PATIENTS

All adults on PD in Western Australia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Isolates and antibiograms were analyzed versus patient characteristics, including race and patient demographics.

RESULTS

293 patients (28% Aborigines, 32% regional patients) received PD. 145 episodes of PD peritonitis occurred during the study. The overall PD peritonitis rate was 1 episode/16 patient months, with Aborigines having 1 episode/10.5 patient months versus non-Aborigines having 1 episode/17 patient months (p < 0.001). 36% of isolates from PD peritonitis episodes were resistant to cefazolin or ceftazidime. 22% were methicillin-resistant GPB (MR-GPB) [18% coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), 1.6% MR Staphylococcus aureus]; 2.5% were multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB); 5.7% were polymicrobial (MR-GPB and/or MDR-GNB); and 5.7% were fungal. 63% of CoNS were methicillin resistant. Non-Aboriginal patients yielded MR-GPB in 22% of isolates versus 23% in Aborigines (p = 0.9). Six of seven cases of fungal peritonitis occurred in Aboriginal patients (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study population the ISPD guidelines were appropriate for 64% of patients with PD peritonitis. We could not identify specific patient subgroups where empiric cefazolin use could be more effective. High proportions of MR-GPB PD peritonitis episodes, along with local factors, make empiric cefazolin unsuitable for many regional PD patients in Western Australia.

摘要

背景

国际腹膜透析学会(ISPD)指南推荐使用头孢唑林和头孢他啶对腹膜透析(PD)相关腹膜炎进行经验性治疗。由于革兰氏阳性菌(GPB)中耐甲氧西林情况的出现,经验性使用头孢唑林治疗的疗效可能会降低。西澳大利亚州也有大量原住民和偏远地区患者,使用这些抗菌药物可能不切实际。

目的

根据当地抗菌药物耐药模式,评估在西澳大利亚州遵循ISPD指南的可行性,并确定可能从替代经验性腹腔内抗生素(如万古霉素)中获益的PD腹膜炎患者亚组。

研究设计

对2000年2月1日至2001年1月31日期间西澳大利亚州所有PD腹膜炎发作进行回顾性研究。

研究地点

珀斯都会区和西澳大利亚州地区的三家成人三级转诊大学医院及其PD患者。

患者

西澳大利亚州所有接受PD治疗的成年人。

主要观察指标

对分离菌和抗菌谱与患者特征(包括种族和患者人口统计学特征)进行分析。

结果

293例患者(28%为原住民,32%为偏远地区患者)接受了PD治疗。研究期间发生了145例PD腹膜炎发作。总体PD腹膜炎发生率为每16个患者月1次发作,原住民为每10.5个患者月1次发作,而非原住民为每17个患者月1次发作(p<0.001)。PD腹膜炎发作分离出的菌株中,36%对头孢唑林或头孢他啶耐药。2%为耐甲氧西林GPB(MR-GPB)[18%为凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CoNS),1.6%为耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌];2.5%为多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌(MDR-GNB);5.7%为混合菌感染(MR-GPB和/或MDR-GNB);5.7%为真菌。63%的CoNS对甲氧西林耐药。非原住民患者分离出的菌株中22%为MR-GPB,原住民患者中这一比例为23%(p=0.9)。7例真菌性腹膜炎病例中有6例发生在原住民患者中(p<0.001)。

结论

在我们的研究人群中,ISPD指南适用于64%的PD腹膜炎患者。我们无法确定经验性使用头孢唑林可能更有效的特定患者亚组。MR-GPB引起的PD腹膜炎发作比例较高,以及当地因素,使得经验性使用头孢唑林不适用于西澳大利亚州许多偏远地区的PD患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验