Raymond P D, Ray M J, Callen S N, Marsh N A
Research Concentration in Biological and Medical Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Perfusion. 2003 Sep;18(5):269-76. doi: 10.1191/0267659103pf672oa.
There is limited published data on the agreement between techniques for monitoring heparin levels. The aim of this study was to validate the Hepcon/HMS, with particular focus on the agreement with laboratory anti-Xa assay. The performances of two ACT instruments--Hemochron and HemoTec--were also evaluated, including an assessment for interchangeability. Blood samples from 42 adult cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) patients were analysed for activated clotting time (ACT), whole-blood heparin concentration (Hepcon/HMS) and anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) plasma heparin concentration. Agreement between measures was determined using the method of Bland and Altman. Simple analysis of agreement between the Hepcon and anti-Xa heparin revealed the Hepcon has a mean bias of -0.46 U/mL, with the limits of agreement +/- 1.12 U/mL. The comparison between ACT instruments indicated a mean difference of -96 seconds for the HemoTec, with limits of +/- 265 seconds. The Hepcon/ HMS instrument displayed satisfactory agreement with anti-Xa plasma heparin concentration, as the expected variation would not be expected to cause problems in the clinical setting. Agreement between the two measurements of ACT may be satisfactory, provided each is assigned a different target value.
关于肝素水平监测技术之间一致性的已发表数据有限。本研究的目的是验证Hepcon/HMS,特别关注其与实验室抗Xa测定法的一致性。还评估了两种活化凝血时间(ACT)仪器——Hemochron和HemoTec的性能,包括互换性评估。对42例成人体外循环(CPB)患者的血样进行了活化凝血时间(ACT)、全血肝素浓度(Hepcon/HMS)和抗Xa因子(抗Xa)血浆肝素浓度分析。采用Bland和Altman方法确定测量值之间的一致性。Hepcon与抗Xa肝素之间的一致性简单分析显示,Hepcon的平均偏差为-0.46 U/mL,一致性界限为±1.12 U/mL。ACT仪器之间的比较表明,HemoTec的平均差异为-96秒,界限为±265秒。Hepcon/HMS仪器与抗Xa血浆肝素浓度显示出令人满意的一致性,因为预期的差异在临床环境中预计不会引起问题。如果为ACT的两次测量分别指定不同的目标值,两者之间的一致性可能令人满意。