Kaestner Robert, Kaushal Neeraj
Institute of Government and Public Affairs, University of Illinois at Chicago, 815 W. Van Buren Street, Suite 525, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.
J Health Econ. 2003 Nov;22(6):959-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.06.004.
We study whether welfare reform adversely affected the health insurance coverage of low-educated single mothers and their children. Specifically, we investigate whether changes in the welfare caseload during the 1990s were associated with changes in Medicaid participation, private insurance coverage, and the number of uninsured among single mothers and their children. Estimates suggest that between 1996 and 1999, the 42% decrease in the welfare caseload was associated with the following changes in insurance coverage among low-educated, single mothers: a 7-9% decrease in Medicaid coverage; an increase in employer-sponsored, private insurance coverage of 6%; and a 2-9% increase in the proportion uninsured. Among children of low-educated, single mothers, effects were somewhat smaller. Since welfare policy was responsible for only part (e.g. one-third) of the decline in the caseload, welfare reform per se had significantly smaller effects on the health insurance status of low-income families. However, we found limited evidence that changes in the caseload due to state and federal welfare policy had fewer adverse consequences on insurance status than changes in the caseload due to other factors. This implies even smaller effects of welfare reform.
我们研究福利改革是否对低学历单身母亲及其子女的医疗保险覆盖情况产生了不利影响。具体而言,我们调查了20世纪90年代福利案件量的变化是否与单身母亲及其子女的医疗补助参与情况、私人保险覆盖情况以及未参保人数的变化相关。估计结果表明,在1996年至1999年期间,福利案件量下降42%与低学历单身母亲的保险覆盖情况发生以下变化有关:医疗补助覆盖下降7%至9%;雇主提供的私人保险覆盖增加6%;未参保比例增加2%至9%。在低学历单身母亲的子女中,影响略小。由于福利政策仅导致了案件量下降的一部分(例如三分之一),福利改革本身对低收入家庭医疗保险状况的影响要小得多。然而,我们发现有限的证据表明,与因其他因素导致的案件量变化相比,州和联邦福利政策导致的案件量变化对保险状况的不利影响较小。这意味着福利改革的影响甚至更小。