Karmy-Jones Riyad, Hoffer Eric, Meissner Mark H, Nicholls Stephen, Mattos Mark
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
J Trauma. 2003 Nov;55(5):805-10. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000094429.98136.29.
Endovascular stent grafts (EVSGs) offer an alternative in the management of traumatic rupture of the aorta, particularly in patients who are at prohibitive operative risk.
We conducted a retrospective review of 11 cases managed by EVSGs over a 4-year period. EVSGs were defined as "noncommercial" (graft material hand sewn over metallic stents) or "commercial" (grafts marketed for infrarenal aortic or thoracic aneurysms). Data collected included the difference between endovascular stent graft length, tear length (apposition length), and location relative to the left subclavian artery.
EVSGs (three noncommercial and eight commercial, including AneuRx cuff [six], Talent [one], and Ancure aortic tube graft [one]) were used in 11 patients. Six were placed less than or equal to 8 hours from injury, one after 14 hours, three after 5 days, and one 10 years after injury. Routes of access included femoral (four), iliac (three), and abdominal aorta (four). Average landing zone diameter was 18.8 +/- 3.5 mm, distance from the left subclavian artery was 2.85 +/- 2.1 cm, and tear length was 1.54 +/- 1.0 cm. In four cases, the apposition length was less than 2 cm. There were two cases of persistent endoleak and two cases of endoleak noted and treated at deployment. Persistent endoleak occurred in two of three noncommercial EVSGs. Endoleak occurred in three of four cases when apposition length was less than 2 cm, one of which was treated successfully at the time of placement by deploying extension grafts. Endoleak occurred in two of six cases when deployment was within 2 cm of the origin of the left subclavian artery. In one case of persistent endoleak, open repair was performed 3 weeks later when the patient had stabilized. Ultimately, there were three deaths, two caused by severe closed head injury and one caused by respiratory failure.
Endovascular stent grafts can be placed emergently. Commercial grafts result in better results than noncommercial grafts. Available "cuff extenders" are sufficient for the majority of aortic injuries but often require deployment via the iliac or aorta because of the shorter delivery system. Tears more than 1.5 cm resulting in apposition length less than 2 cm or those near or in the curvature of the aorta are associated with increased endoleak risk. The ideal thoracic EVSG would be available in 5-, 7.5-, 10-, and 15-cm lengths and mounted on a system 80 cm in length.
血管内支架移植物(EVSG)为主动脉创伤性破裂的治疗提供了一种替代方法,尤其适用于手术风险极高的患者。
我们对4年内采用EVSG治疗的11例患者进行了回顾性研究。EVSG被定义为“非商业性的”(将移植材料手工缝在金属支架上)或“商业性的”(用于肾下腹主动脉或胸主动脉瘤的市售移植物)。收集的数据包括血管内支架移植物长度、撕裂长度(贴合长度)以及相对于左锁骨下动脉的位置之间的差异。
11例患者使用了EVSG(3例非商业性的和8例商业性的,包括AneuRx袖套[6例]、Talent[1例]和Ancure主动脉管状移植物[1例])。6例在受伤后8小时内或8小时放置,1例在14小时后放置,3例在5天后放置,1例在受伤10年后放置。入路包括股动脉(4例)、髂动脉(3例)和腹主动脉(4例)。平均着陆区直径为18.8±3.5mm,距左锁骨下动脉的距离为2.85±2.1cm,撕裂长度为1.54±1.0cm。4例患者的贴合长度小于2cm。有2例持续性内漏,2例在放置时发现并治疗内漏。3例非商业性EVSG中有2例发生持续性内漏。当贴合长度小于2cm时,4例中有3例发生内漏,其中1例在放置时通过植入延长移植物成功治疗。当放置位置距左锁骨下动脉起始处2cm以内时,6例中有2例发生内漏。在1例持续性内漏患者中,患者病情稳定3周后进行了开放修复。最终,有3例死亡,2例因严重闭合性颅脑损伤,1例因呼吸衰竭。
血管内支架移植物可以紧急放置。商业性移植物的效果优于非商业性移植物。现有的“袖套延长器”对大多数主动脉损伤来说足够了,但由于输送系统较短,通常需要通过髂动脉或主动脉进行植入。撕裂长度超过1.5cm导致贴合长度小于2cm或位于主动脉弯曲处附近或弯曲处的损伤与内漏风险增加相关。理想的胸段EVSG应有5cm、7.5cm、10cm和15cm的长度,并安装在80cm长的系统上。