Williams Michelle D, Brown Heather M
Department of Patholgoy, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville 32610, USA.
Hum Pathol. 2003 Oct;34(10):1053-7. doi: 10.1053/s0046-8177(03)00408-8.
Most hospitals microscopically examine all routine tonsil and adenoid specimens from healthy pediatric patients with recurrent infections or obstructive sleep apnea. Concern over missing the rare unsuspected, significant diagnosis propagates this practice. Careful gross examination for asymmetry and clinical findings should obviate the need for routine microscopic examination of tonsil and adenoid specimens in patients age 21 years and younger. A retrospective study was conducted using the SNOMED database of 4070 patients age 21 years or younger who underwent tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy between 1970 and July 2001 at the University of Florida. The age distribution of the study group was 0 to 5 years (52%), 6 to 12 years (37%), and 13 to 21 years (11%). Specimens consisted of tonsils only (15%), tonsils and adenoids (40%), and adenoids only (45%). Clinically significant diagnoses were diagnoses that impacted the care of patients and included malignancies and some infections. Non-clinically significant diagnoses included normal, acute or chronic tonsillitis, and tonsillar hyperplasia. Clinically significant pathological processes were seen in the tonsil or adenoid specimens of 3 of the 4070 patients. These 3 cases included a 2-year-old male with Burkitt's lymphoma, a 19-year-old male with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (small noncleaved cell, non-Burkitt's type), and an 11-year-old male with a probable viral process but in whom a lymphoma could not be absolutely excluded. All 3 of these patients had signs and symptoms, including significant cervical lymphadenopathy, meriting microscopic analysis of the specimens. In conclusion, microscopic examination of all routine tonsils and adenoids for individuals 21 years or younger is not indicated. Gross examination is still recommended. Clinical suspicion and specimen asymmetry should be used to determine when thorough histological examination is merited.
大多数医院会对患有反复感染或阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的健康儿科患者的所有常规扁桃体和腺样体标本进行显微镜检查。由于担心漏诊罕见的、未被怀疑的重大疾病,这种做法得以延续。对于21岁及以下的患者,通过仔细的大体检查以发现不对称性和临床症状,应可避免对扁桃体和腺样体标本进行常规显微镜检查的必要性。我们利用国际疾病分类标准(SNOMED)数据库进行了一项回顾性研究,研究对象为1970年至2001年7月在佛罗里达大学接受扁桃体切除术和/或腺样体切除术的4070例21岁及以下患者。研究组的年龄分布为0至5岁(52%),6至12岁(37%),以及13至21岁(11%)。标本包括仅扁桃体(15%)、扁桃体和腺样体(40%),以及仅腺样体(45%)。具有临床意义的诊断是指那些影响患者治疗的诊断,包括恶性肿瘤和一些感染。无临床意义的诊断包括正常、急性或慢性扁桃体炎,以及扁桃体增生。在4070例患者的扁桃体或腺样体标本中,发现了3例具有临床意义的病理过程。这3例病例包括一名患有伯基特淋巴瘤的2岁男性、一名患有非霍奇金淋巴瘤(小无裂细胞,非伯基特型)的19岁男性,以及一名患有可能的病毒感染过程但不能完全排除淋巴瘤的11岁男性。所有这3例患者都有体征和症状,包括明显的颈部淋巴结肿大,因此值得对标本进行显微镜分析。总之,对于21岁及以下的个体,不建议对所有常规扁桃体和腺样体进行显微镜检查。仍建议进行大体检查。应根据临床怀疑和标本不对称性来确定何时值得进行全面的组织学检查。