Suppr超能文献

缬沙坦、卡托普利或两者联合用于治疗合并心力衰竭、左心室功能不全或两者皆有的心肌梗死。

Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both.

作者信息

Pfeffer Marc A, McMurray John J V, Velazquez Eric J, Rouleau Jean-Lucien, Køber Lars, Maggioni Aldo P, Solomon Scott D, Swedberg Karl, Van de Werf Frans, White Harvey, Leimberger Jeffrey D, Henis Marc, Edwards Susan, Zelenkofske Steven, Sellers Mary Ann, Califf Robert M

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2003 Nov 13;349(20):1893-906. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032292. Epub 2003 Nov 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors such as captopril reduce mortality and cardiovascular morbidity among patients with myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular systolic dysfunction, heart failure, or both. In a double-blind trial, we compared the effect of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan, the ACE inhibitor captopril, and the combination of the two on mortality in this population of patients.

METHODS

Patients receiving conventional therapy were randomly assigned, 0.5 to 10 days after acute myocardial infarction, to additional therapy with valsartan (4909 patients), valsartan plus captopril (4885 patients), or captopril (4909 patients). The primary end point was death from any cause.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 24.7 months, 979 patients in the valsartan group died, as did 941 patients in the valsartan-and-captopril group and 958 patients in the captopril group (hazard ratio in the valsartan group as compared with the captopril group, 1.00; 97.5 percent confidence interval, 0.90 to 1.11; P=0.98; hazard ratio in the valsartan-and-captopril group as compared with the captopril group, 0.98; 97.5 percent confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.09; P=0.73). The upper limit of the one-sided 97.5 percent confidence interval for the comparison of the valsartan group with the captopril group was within the prespecified margin for noninferiority with regard to mortality (P=0.004) and with regard to the composite end point of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events (P<0.001). The valsartan-and-captopril group had the most drug-related adverse events. With monotherapy, hypotension and renal dysfunction were more common in the valsartan group, and cough, rash, and taste disturbance were more common in the captopril group.

CONCLUSIONS

Valsartan is as effective as captopril in patients who are at high risk for cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction. Combining valsartan with captopril increased the rate of adverse events without improving survival.

摘要

背景

卡托普利等血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂可降低心肌梗死合并左心室收缩功能障碍、心力衰竭或两者兼有的患者的死亡率和心血管疾病发病率。在一项双盲试验中,我们比较了血管紧张素受体阻滞剂缬沙坦、ACE抑制剂卡托普利以及两者联合用药对这类患者死亡率的影响。

方法

接受常规治疗的患者在急性心肌梗死后0.5至10天被随机分配,分别接受缬沙坦(4909例患者)、缬沙坦加卡托普利(4885例患者)或卡托普利(4909例患者)的附加治疗。主要终点是任何原因导致的死亡。

结果

在中位随访24.7个月期间,缬沙坦组有979例患者死亡,缬沙坦加卡托普利组有941例患者死亡,卡托普利组有958例患者死亡(缬沙坦组与卡托普利组相比的风险比为1.00;97.5%置信区间为0.90至1.11;P = 0.98;缬沙坦加卡托普利组与卡托普利组相比的风险比为0.98;97.5%置信区间为0.89至1.09;P = 0.73)。缬沙坦组与卡托普利组比较的单侧97.5%置信区间的上限在预先规定的死亡率非劣效性范围内(P = 0.004),在致命和非致命心血管事件的复合终点方面也在该范围内(P < 0.001)。缬沙坦加卡托普利组的药物相关不良事件最多。在单药治疗中,缬沙坦组低血压和肾功能不全更常见,卡托普利组咳嗽、皮疹和味觉障碍更常见。

结论

在心肌梗死后心血管事件高危患者中,缬沙坦与卡托普利疗效相当。缬沙坦与卡托普利联合用药增加了不良事件发生率,却未改善生存率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验