Zompatori Maurizio, Calabrò Elisa, Chetta Alfredo, Chiari Gianfranco, Marangio Emilio, Olivieri Dario
Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche, Sezione di Radiologia e UO di Scienze Radiologiche, Università degli Studi, Parma.
Radiol Med. 2003 Sep;106(3):135-46.
In the diagnosis of extrinsic allergic alveolitis, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is more sensitive and more specific than radiography; however, the accuracy of HRCT is not absolute. The role of HRCT in this field has scarcely been investigated in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to explore the possibilities of HRCT in this field and to analyse the correlations between HRCT and functional parameters.
We performed a retrospective blind evaluation the HRCT scans of 24 patients (19 males and 5 females). Twelve were affected by idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF); 12 had chronic extrinsic allergic alveolitis (EAA) or hypersensitivity pneumonitis. The HRCT findings were studied by two radiologists, who were not aware of the diagnoses. The possible differences in evaluation were subsequently resolved by consensus. In the presence of interstitial fibrosis, we recorded the prevailing site and the anatomical extension (with the method of the visual percentage score, described in the literature). In all the cases, we recorded the blood gas values (PaO2, PaCO2, and pH), total lung capacity (TLC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), Vital Capacity (VC), Tiffeneau index (FEV1/VC) and monoxide carbon diffusion (DLCO). The statistical significance of the correlations was investigated using the Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests. Student "t"-test and Pearson's chi squared were used to compare the variables of the different groups. A value of p< or =0.05 was considered significant.
Overall, the diagnosis was formulated with a high degree of confidence in 13 of 24 cases (54.1%); in these patients, the result was correct in 84.6% of cases (11 of 13). In the diagnosis of EAA, HRCT sensitivity was 50%, with 91.6% specificity, 70.8% accuracy. In the diagnosis of IPF, HRCT sensitivity was 75%, with 83.3% specificity, 79.1% accuracy. The HRCT signs of interstitial fibrosis were visible in 11 cases of IPF (91.6%) and in 4 cases of EAA (33.3%), with significant statistical difference (p<0.005). In the analysis of the whole series (24 patients) we found a significant inverse correlation between the HRCT score of fibrosis and the extension of the areas with air-trapping (p<0.003). There was no significant difference between IPF and EAA considering age, FEV1, PaO2, PaCO2 and pH. We found inverse correlation (p<0.001) between HRCT extension of the fibrosis and DLCO. There was a significant difference between pulmonary fibrosis and extrinsic allergic alveolitis considering TLC (in average, respectively: 65% and 84.3%; p<0.02), and DLCO (respectively 40.4% and 74.7%; p<0.03).
HRCT is a reliable and strong method to be used in particularly complex fields. We found signs of interstitial fibrosis more frequently in IPF than in EAA (91.6% versus 33.3%). In IPF cases, the extension of the fibrosis--evaluated with the visual score method--was higher then in EAA (34.7% versus 6%). The presence of fibrosis with basal and peripheral distribution was characteristic of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, with good sensitivity and specificity (75%), whereas in chronic extrinsic allergic alveolitis the areas of fibrosis often presented an irregular and heterogeneous distribution, in 91.6% of cases. However, 25% of extrinsic allergic alveolitis cases had a distribution mimicking idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The presence of areas with increased ground-glass opacity is more common in EAA than in IPF (66.6% versus 33.3%). Areas of mosaic attenuation, visible in inspiratory CT scans, are not rare in IPF (41.6% of cases), and generally have a basal distribution. The presence of hyperlucent lobules inside the fibrotic areas does not exclude the diagnosis of IPF. The finding of the expiratory air-trapping is more common in chronic EAA than in IPF, and the extension of this areas is greater in EAA (17.3% versus 6.5%). We found an inverse correlation between the extension of the fibrosis and the expiratory trapping. Signs of emphysema were observed in 25% of cases, wiema were observed in 25% of cases, with equal prevalence and the same extension in IPF and in EAA. All patients were smokers or ex-smokers. Smoking has not been demonstrated to have a protective effect against EAA. The areas of mosaic perfusion during inspiration do not represent a sound criterion for the differential diagnosis between IPF and chronic EAA. In fact, they can also be frequently found in IPF. HRCT can be employed in clinical practice for the differential diagnosis between IPF and chronic EAA with good (but not absolute) accuracy.
在外源性过敏性肺泡炎的诊断中,高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)比X线摄影更敏感、更具特异性;然而,HRCT的准确性并非绝对。HRCT在该领域的作用在文献中鲜有研究。本文旨在探讨HRCT在该领域的应用可能性,并分析HRCT与功能参数之间的相关性。
我们对24例患者(19例男性和5例女性)的HRCT扫描进行了回顾性盲法评估。其中12例患有特发性肺纤维化(IPF);12例患有慢性外源性过敏性肺泡炎(EAA)或过敏性肺炎。由两位不知诊断结果的放射科医生研究HRCT表现。随后通过共识解决评估中可能存在的差异。在存在间质纤维化的情况下,我们记录了主要部位和解剖学范围(采用文献中描述的视觉百分比评分法)。在所有病例中,我们记录了血气值(PaO2、PaCO2和pH)、肺总量(TLC)、第1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、肺活量(VC)、蒂芬诺指数(FEV1/VC)和一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)。使用Mann-Whitney和Wilcoxon检验研究相关性的统计学意义。采用Student“t”检验和Pearson卡方检验比较不同组的变量。p≤0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
总体而言,24例中有13例(54.1%)诊断信心度高;在这些患者中,84.6%(13例中的11例)结果正确。在EAA诊断中,HRCT敏感性为50%,特异性为91.6%,准确性为70.8%。在IPF诊断中,HRCT敏感性为75%,特异性为83.3%,准确性为79.1%。11例IPF(91.6%)和4例EAA(33.3%)可见间质纤维化的HRCT征象,差异有统计学意义(p<0.005)。在对整个系列(24例患者)的分析中,我们发现纤维化的HRCT评分与空气潴留区域的范围之间存在显著负相关(p<0.003)。在年龄、FEV1、PaO2、PaCO2和pH方面,IPF和EAA之间无显著差异。我们发现纤维化的HRCT范围与DLCO之间存在负相关(p<0.001)。在TLC(平均分别为65%和84.3%;p<0.02)和DLCO(分别为40.4%和74.7%;p<0.03)方面,肺纤维化和外源性过敏性肺泡炎之间存在显著差异。
HRCT是一种可靠且强大的方法,可用于特别复杂的领域。我们发现IPF中间质纤维化征象比EAA更常见(91.6%对33.3%)。在IPF病例中,用视觉评分法评估的纤维化范围高于EAA(34.7%对6%)。特发性肺纤维化的特征是纤维化呈基底和周边分布,敏感性和特异性良好(75%),而在慢性外源性过敏性肺泡炎中,纤维化区域常呈不规则和不均匀分布,91.6%的病例如此。然而,25%的外源性过敏性肺泡炎病例分布类似特发性肺纤维化。磨玻璃密度增高区域在EAA中比在IPF中更常见(66.6%对33.3%)。吸气CT扫描中可见的马赛克样衰减区域在IPF中并不少见(41.6%的病例),且通常呈基底分布。纤维化区域内存在透亮小叶并不能排除IPF的诊断。呼气性空气潴留的发现在慢性EAA中比在IPF中更常见,且该区域在EAA中的范围更大(17.3%对6.5%)。我们发现纤维化范围与呼气性潴留之间存在负相关。25%的病例观察到肺气肿征象,IPF和EAA的患病率和范围相同。所有患者均为吸烟者或既往吸烟者。吸烟未被证明对EAA有保护作用。吸气时的马赛克样灌注区域不是IPF和慢性EAA鉴别诊断的可靠标准。事实上,它们在IPF中也经常出现。HRCT可在临床实践中用于IPF和慢性EAA的鉴别诊断,准确性良好(但非绝对)。