Garitey V, Rieu R, Alimi Y S
Laboratoire de Biomécanique Cardiovasculaire, IRPHE CNRS UMR 6594, Ecole Supérieure de Mécanique de Marseille.
J Mal Vasc. 2003 Oct;28(4):173-7.
--To evaluate mechanical strength of new potential systems of vascular prostheses anastomosis versus usual suture (4.0 yarn), --To advance objective quantified data in order to establish the specifications of a new quick and reliable mechanical anastomosis device for laparoscopic surgery.
Two experimental studies were conducted in order to quantify the mechanical resistance of anastomoses between two Dacron vascular prostheses and anastomoses between one Dacron vascular prosthesis and one cadaver abdominal aorta segment. Existing materials, which have generally used for other types of surgery, were applied for these studies (clips, staples, stents). These systems of anastomosis were compared to usual suture, used as reference.
The mechanical strength of an anastomosis between two Dacron vascular prostheses performed with staples or the same number of stitches is of equivalent magnitude. Anastomoses made with clips or stent are ten to fifteen times weaker than those made with stitches. We did not succeed in performing an anastomosis with staples on cadaver aorta segments because aorta segments tear when staples are applied. In the experiments with a hand-sewn graft, the aorta always tor before the suture, without breakage of the suture.
From these in vitro trials, we can advance that a continuous suture is probably far too resistant in relation to the aorta own resistance. As we do not know accurately the physiologic strength applied to a vascular prosthesis in vivo, one acceptance criterion from a safety point of view for a new anastomosis system must be that its strength will be equal to the well-proven continuous suture (greater than 150 N) or to the aorta breaking point (between 100 and 160 N). From that point of view, anastomoses performed with clips or a stent are not convenient, unless special clips or stents can be developed for this application. The mechanical strength is of staples sufficient but their design has to be adapted to this particular type of anastomosis.
——评估新型潜在血管假体吻合系统与传统缝合(4.0缝线)的机械强度,——获取客观量化数据,以确定一种用于腹腔镜手术的新型快速可靠机械吻合装置的规格。
进行了两项实验研究,以量化两根涤纶血管假体之间吻合口以及一根涤纶血管假体与一段尸体腹主动脉之间吻合口的机械阻力。这些研究采用了通常用于其他类型手术的现有材料(夹子、吻合钉、支架)。将这些吻合系统与用作对照的传统缝合进行比较。
用吻合钉或相同针数进行的两根涤纶血管假体之间的吻合口机械强度相当。用夹子或支架进行的吻合比用缝线进行的吻合弱10至15倍。在尸体主动脉段上用吻合钉进行吻合未成功,因为施加吻合钉时主动脉段会撕裂。在手工缝合移植物的实验中,主动脉总是在缝线之前撕裂,缝线未断裂。
从这些体外试验可以推断,连续缝合相对于主动脉自身阻力可能过于坚韧。由于我们并不准确了解体内施加于血管假体的生理强度,从安全角度来看,一种新的吻合系统的一个可接受标准必须是其强度等于经过充分验证的连续缝合(大于150牛)或等于主动脉破裂点(100至160牛之间)。从这个角度来看,用夹子或支架进行的吻合不方便,除非能为此应用开发特殊的夹子或支架。吻合钉的机械强度足够,但它们的设计必须适应这种特殊类型的吻合。