Suppr超能文献

癌症成年患者疼痛测量方法的有效性和可靠性。

The validity and reliability of pain measures in adults with cancer.

作者信息

Jensen Mark P

机构信息

University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

出版信息

J Pain. 2003 Feb;4(1):2-21. doi: 10.1054/jpai.2003.1.

Abstract

To be most useful, clinical trials of cancer pain treatments should use pain measures that are both reliable and valid. A great variety of measures are now available that may be used to assess cancer pain. However, there are not yet any clear guidelines for selecting one or more measures over the others. The purpose of this article is to summarize the evidence concerning the validity and reliability of cancer pain measures. One hundred sixty-four articles were identified that provided psychometric data of pain measures among patients with cancer. The results indicate that commonly used single-item ratings of pain intensity are all valid and adequately reliable as measures of pain intensity, although some scales appear to be easier for patients with cancer to understand and to use than others. Multiple-item measures of pain intensity are reliable, but evidence concerning their validity is lacking. There is a paucity of research examining the psychometric properties of measures of cancer pain interference, pain relief, pain site, the temporal aspects of pain, and pain quality. This lack of evidence limits the conclusions that may be drawn concerning the reliability and validity of these other pain measures. Composite measures that combine ratings of pain intensity and pain interference into a single score appear to be both valid and reliable for describing patient populations, although their usefulness in clinical trials may be limited because they can obscure the contributions of intensity and interference to the total score. Proxy measures of cancer pain (pain ratings made by someone other than the patient) may be useful when patients are not able to provide pain ratings, but they should not be used as replacements for patient ratings when patient self-report measures are available. The discussion includes specific recommendations for selecting from among the available pain measures, as well as recommendations for future research into the assessment of cancer pain.

摘要

为了发挥最大作用,癌症疼痛治疗的临床试验应采用既可靠又有效的疼痛测量方法。现在有各种各样的测量方法可用于评估癌症疼痛。然而,对于选择一种或多种测量方法而非其他方法,目前尚无明确的指导原则。本文的目的是总结有关癌症疼痛测量方法的有效性和可靠性的证据。共识别出164篇文章,这些文章提供了癌症患者疼痛测量的心理测量数据。结果表明,常用的疼痛强度单项评分作为疼痛强度的测量方法都是有效的且可靠性足够,尽管有些量表对癌症患者来说似乎比其他量表更容易理解和使用。疼痛强度的多项测量方法是可靠的,但缺乏关于其有效性的证据。关于癌症疼痛干扰、疼痛缓解、疼痛部位、疼痛的时间方面和疼痛性质的测量方法的心理测量特性的研究很少。这种证据的缺乏限制了就这些其他疼痛测量方法的可靠性和有效性得出的结论。将疼痛强度和疼痛干扰评分合并为单一分数的综合测量方法对于描述患者群体似乎既有效又可靠,尽管它们在临床试验中的实用性可能有限,因为它们可能掩盖强度和干扰对总分的贡献。当患者无法提供疼痛评分时,癌症疼痛的代理测量方法(由患者以外的人进行的疼痛评分)可能有用,但当有患者自我报告测量方法时,不应将其用作患者评分的替代方法。讨论包括从可用的疼痛测量方法中进行选择的具体建议,以及对未来癌症疼痛评估研究的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验