Fernandez E, Boyle G J
Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275-0442, USA.
J Pain. 2001 Dec;2(6):318-25. doi: 10.1054/jpai.2001.xbcorr25530.
Recent reports indicate that several descriptors of pain sensations in the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) are difficult to classify within MPQ sensory subcategories because of incomprehension, underuse, or ambiguity of usage. Adopting the same methodology of recent studies, the present investigation focused on the affective and evaluative subcategories of the MPQ. A decision rule revealed that only 6 of 18 words met criteria for the affective category and 5 of 11 words met criteria for the evaluative category, thus warranting a reduced list of words in these categories. This reduction, however, led to negligible loss of information transmitted. Despite notable changes in classification, the intensity ratings of the retained words correlated very highly with those originally reported for the MPQ. In conclusion, although the intensity ratings of MPQ affective and evaluative descriptors need no revision, selective reduction and reorganization of these descriptors can enhance the efficiency of this approach to pain assessment.
最近的报告表明,由于理解困难、使用不足或用法模糊,麦吉尔疼痛问卷(MPQ)中疼痛感觉的几个描述词难以在MPQ感觉亚类别中进行分类。采用与近期研究相同的方法,本研究聚焦于MPQ的情感和评价亚类别。一项决策规则显示,18个词中只有6个符合情感类别的标准,11个词中只有5个符合评价类别的标准,因此有必要减少这些类别中的词列表。然而,这种减少导致所传递信息的损失可忽略不计。尽管分类有显著变化,但保留词的强度评级与最初报告的MPQ强度评级高度相关。总之,虽然MPQ情感和评价描述词的强度评级无需修订,但对这些描述词进行选择性减少和重新组织可以提高这种疼痛评估方法的效率。