Suppr超能文献

完全性直肠脱垂的治疗:缩窄、包裹、悬吊、固定、环扎、折叠还是切除?

Treatment of complete rectal prolapse: to narrow, to wrap, to suspend, to fix, to encircle, to plicate or to resect?

作者信息

Kuijpers H C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

World J Surg. 1992 Sep-Oct;16(5):826-30. doi: 10.1007/BF02066977.

Abstract

Selection of the best surgical procedure for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse is difficult amid the many different techniques for which excellent results are reported. A critical review is given. It is concluded that any surgical procedure with rectal mobilization and fixation as a standard maneuver will lead to a recurrence rate of 2% to 4%. Advocacy of additional maneuvers to make the procedure easier is acceptable if it does not lead to a higher complication rate. But to obtain a better result its benefit has to be proven, either by a large prospective double-blind study, or by tests from the colorectal laboratory. New surgical techniques for rectal prolapse should therefore be based, not only on a low recurrence and complication rate, but also on tests that evaluate the effect of the procedure on fecal continence.

摘要

在众多报道显示效果良好的不同技术中,选择最佳手术方法来治疗完全性直肠脱垂颇具难度。本文进行了批判性综述。得出的结论是,任何以直肠游离和固定作为标准操作的手术方法,其复发率都将在2%至4%。如果额外操作不会导致更高的并发症发生率,那么提倡采用这些操作以使手术更简便,这种做法是可以接受的。但是,要想获得更好的效果,其益处必须通过大型前瞻性双盲研究或结直肠实验室测试来证明。因此,直肠脱垂的新手术技术不仅应基于低复发率和低并发症率,还应基于评估该手术对大便失禁影响的测试。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验