Rogelberg Steven G, Conway James M, Sederburg Matthew E, Spitzmuller Christiane, Aziz Shanaz, Knight William E
Dept of Psychology, University of North Carolina-Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223-0001, US.
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Dec;88(6):1104-14. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1104.
In this field study (N = 405) population profiling was introduced to examine general and specific classes of nonresponse (active vs. passive) to a satisfaction survey. The active nonrespondent group (i.e., purposeful nonresponders) was relatively small (approximately 15%). Active nonrespondents, in comparison with respondents, were less satisfied with the entity sponsoring the survey and were less conscientious. Passive nonrespondents (e.g., forgot), who represented the majority of nonrespondents, were attitudinally similar to respondents but differed with regard to personality. Nonresponse bias does not appear to be a substantive concern for satisfaction type variables--the typical core of an organizational survey. If the survey concerns topics strongly related to Conscientiousness and Agreeableness, the respondent sample may not be representative of the population.
在这项实地研究(N = 405)中,引入了总体概况分析来考察对满意度调查的一般性和特定类别的无回应情况(主动无回应与被动无回应)。主动无回应组(即有目的的无回应者)相对较小(约15%)。与回应者相比,主动无回应者对调查主办方的满意度较低,且责任心较差。被动无回应者(例如忘记回应)占无回应者的大多数,他们在态度上与回应者相似,但在个性方面存在差异。对于满意度类型变量(组织调查的典型核心内容)而言,无回应偏差似乎并不是一个实质性问题。如果调查涉及与尽责性和宜人性密切相关的主题,那么受访者样本可能无法代表总体。