• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下肢截肢者康复期间助行器的使用

Ambulation aid use during the rehabilitation of people with lower limb amputations.

作者信息

Kirby R Lee, Tsai H Y Amy, Graham Monette M

机构信息

Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Assist Technol. 2002 Winter;14(2):112-7. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2002.10132060.

DOI:10.1080/10400435.2002.10132060
PMID:14651249
Abstract

Our objective was to describe the progression of ambulation aid use by people with lower limb amputations during their initial rehabilitation. We prospectively studied 37 people with recent lower limb amputations and a mean (SD) age of 68 (13) years. Subjects were evaluated each weekday during gait-training physiotherapy sessions, and the type and order of ambulation aids used during ambulation training were documented. The total number of gait-training sessions that we observed was 605, with a mean (SD) of 16.4 (7.7) sessions per participant and a range of 5-47. Of the 37 participants, 33 (89%) were discharged with prostheses. The mean (SD) number of aids per person was 2.9 (1.0). The percentage of participants who used each aid (presented in the mean order in which they were first used) were 76% parallel bars, 60% four-footed walkers, 81% two-wheeled walkers, 11% two crutches, 8% four-wheeled walkers, 46% two canes, and 14% one cane. People with lower limb amputations generally use a number of ambulation aids in a fairly consistent order as they progress through their initial rehabilitation. These findings have implications for the process of providing ambulation aids and provide a foundation for further study.

摘要

我们的目标是描述下肢截肢患者在初始康复期间使用助行器的进展情况。我们前瞻性地研究了37例近期下肢截肢患者,平均(标准差)年龄为68(13)岁。在步态训练物理治疗期间,每个工作日对受试者进行评估,并记录步行训练期间使用的助行器类型和顺序。我们观察到的步态训练总次数为605次,每位参与者平均(标准差)为16.4(7.7)次,范围为5 - 47次。37名参与者中,33名(89%)佩戴假肢出院。每人使用的助行器平均(标准差)数量为2.9(1.0)个。使用每种助行器的参与者百分比(按首次使用的平均顺序列出)分别为:平行杠76%、四脚助行器60%、两轮助行器81%、双拐11%、四轮助行器8%、双杖46%、单杖14%。下肢截肢患者在初始康复过程中通常会按照相当一致的顺序使用多种助行器。这些发现对提供助行器的过程具有启示意义,并为进一步研究奠定了基础。

相似文献

1
Ambulation aid use during the rehabilitation of people with lower limb amputations.下肢截肢者康复期间助行器的使用
Assist Technol. 2002 Winter;14(2):112-7. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2002.10132060.
2
Aided gait of people with lower-limb amputations: comparison of 4-footed and 2-wheeled walkers.下肢截肢者的辅助步态:四脚步行器和两轮步行器的比较
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Apr;84(4):584-91. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50079.
3
Canes, crutches and walkers.手杖、拐杖和助行器。
Am Fam Physician. 1991 Feb;43(2):535-42.
4
Ambulation aids.
Health Devices. 1991 Jan;20(1):5-22.
5
Comparative Study of Assisted Ambulation and Perceived Exertion With the Wheeled Knee Walker and Axillary Crutches in Healthy Subjects.健康受试者使用轮式膝关节步行器和腋拐辅助行走及主观用力程度的比较研究。
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Nov;37(11):1232-1237. doi: 10.1177/1071100716659748. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
6
Intuitive control of a powered prosthetic leg during ambulation: a randomized clinical trial.助行中的动力假肢直觉控制:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Jun 9;313(22):2244-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.4527.
7
The effect of three different types of walking aids on spatio-temporal gait parameters in community-dwelling older adults.三种不同类型助行器对社区居住老年人时空步态参数的影响。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2014 Apr;26(2):221-8. doi: 10.1007/s40520-014-0204-4. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
8
Leg muscle activity during walking with assistive devices at varying levels of weight bearing.在不同负重水平下使用辅助器械行走时腿部肌肉的活动情况。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Sep;85(9):1555-60. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.09.011.
9
Stability of walking frames.
J Rehabil Res Dev. 1996 Feb;33(1):30-5.
10
Partial weight-bearing gait using conventional assistive devices.使用传统辅助器械的部分负重步态。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Mar;86(3):394-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.03.026.