Suppr超能文献

美国调查中儿童保育数据的质量与可比性。

The quality and comparability of child care data in U.S. surveys.

作者信息

Raley R K, Harris M K, Rindfuss R R

机构信息

Department of Sociology, University of Texas, TX, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Res. 2000 Sep;29(3):356-81. doi: 10.1006/ssre.2000.0673.

Abstract

This paper examines the quality and comparability of child care data obtained from eight waves of data from four nationally representative data sources: the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (1986 and 1988), the Survey of Income and Program Participation (1986, 1987, 1988, and 1990), the National Child Care Survey, and the National Survey of Families and Households. We examine whether different study designs and survey techniques for asking questions about child care produce similar results on both the levels and determinants of child care. We identified four main sources of difference in the data sets that could impact the quality and comparability of child care research: when the interview is conducted; screening questions used to determine who is asked about child care; the population of parents and children represented in the survey; and the way child care questions are asked. Our findings indicate that summer interviews and screening on mother's work status produce the largest differences in the levels and effects of child care across these studies. Even after removing the effects of summer interviews and screening questions, however, substantial differences exist across the studies.

摘要

本文考察了从四个具有全国代表性的数据来源的八轮数据中获取的儿童保育数据的质量和可比性,这四个数据来源分别是:《全国青年纵向调查》(1986年和1988年)、《收入与项目参与调查》(1986年、1987年、1988年和1990年)、《全国儿童保育调查》以及《全国家庭与住户调查》。我们研究了询问儿童保育问题的不同研究设计和调查技术在儿童保育的水平和决定因素方面是否会产生相似的结果。我们确定了数据集中可能影响儿童保育研究质量和可比性的四个主要差异来源:访谈的时间;用于确定谁会被问及儿童保育问题的筛选问题;调查中所代表的父母和儿童群体;以及询问儿童保育问题的方式。我们的研究结果表明,夏季访谈以及根据母亲的工作状况进行筛选,在这些研究中儿童保育的水平和影响方面产生的差异最大。然而,即使消除了夏季访谈和筛选问题的影响,各研究之间仍存在显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验