Suppr超能文献

使用灵活单剂量促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂(西曲瑞克)和单剂量长效促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(戈舍瑞林)方案进行体外受精周期的疗效比较——一项前瞻性随机研究。

Comparable effectiveness using flexible single-dose GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) and single-dose long GnRH agonist (goserelin) protocol for IVF cycles--a prospective, randomized study.

作者信息

Vlaisavljevic Veljko, Reljic Milan, Lovrec Vida Gavric, Kovacic Borut

机构信息

Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecologic Endocrinology, Maribor Teaching Hospital, Ljubljanska 5, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Online. 2003 Oct;7(3):301-8. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61868-8.

Abstract

This prospective randomized study compared the effectiveness of a flexible single-dose gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist (cetrorelix) and a single-dose long GnRH agonist (goserelin) protocol for ovarian stimulation in IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. All patients from the waiting list were successively included in the study, pre-programmed with an oral contraceptive, and randomized into goserelin and cetrorelix groups. Depending on the date on which their menstrual period started, patients took oral contraceptives for one or two cycles. Ultimately, 236 patients in the first group received a single dose of depot preparation of goserelin and 224 patients received a single 3 mg dose of cetrorelix in the late follicular phase, when the mean follicle diameter exceeded 12 mm. The mean number of ampoules of FSH and the duration of stimulation was statistically significantly lower in the cetrorelix group than in the goserelin group (25.9 versus 34.5, and 9.6 versus 12.2 days, P < 0.01). The mean number of oocytes retrieved was similar (6.7 +/- 4.5 versus 7.2 +/- 4.6, NS). Similar results were observed in fertilization rates, blastulation rates and blastocyst transfer rates in both groups. Clinical pregnancy and delivery rates per cycle were higher in the goserelin group (34.3 and 30.1%) than in the cetrorelix group (31.9 and 28.3%), but the differences were not statistically significant. The flexible single-dose GnRH antagonist protocol is an advantageous alternative to the long GnRH agonist protocol, with similar efficacy, shorter duration, a significant reduction in the number of FSH ampoules used and without the menopause-like effects of the GnRH antagonist.

摘要

这项前瞻性随机研究比较了灵活单剂量促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂(西曲瑞克)和单剂量长效GnRH激动剂(戈舍瑞林)方案在体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)周期中刺激卵巢的有效性。所有来自等候名单的患者均依次纳入研究,预先服用口服避孕药,并随机分为戈舍瑞林组和西曲瑞克组。根据月经开始日期,患者服用口服避孕药一或两个周期。最终,第一组中的236例患者在卵泡晚期接受了单剂量戈舍瑞林长效注射剂,224例患者在平均卵泡直径超过12 mm时接受了单剂量3 mg西曲瑞克。西曲瑞克组促卵泡素(FSH)安瓿的平均数量和刺激持续时间在统计学上显著低于戈舍瑞林组(分别为25.9对34.5,以及9.6对12.2天,P<0.01)。两组中回收的卵母细胞平均数量相似(分别为6.7±4.5对7.2±4.6,无显著性差异)。两组在受精率、囊胚形成率和囊胚移植率方面观察到相似结果。戈舍瑞林组每周期的临床妊娠率和分娩率高于西曲瑞克组(分别为34.3%和30.1%对31.9%和28.3%),但差异无统计学意义。灵活单剂量GnRH拮抗剂方案是长效GnRH激动剂方案的一个有利替代方案,具有相似的疗效、更短的疗程、显著减少FSH安瓿的使用数量且无GnRH激动剂的类绝经效应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验