Suppr超能文献

使用钛网和局部自体移植进行颈椎前路融合术的陷阱

Pitfalls of anterior cervical fusion using titanium mesh and local autograft.

作者信息

Kanayama Masahiro, Hashimoto Tomoyuki, Shigenobu Keiichi, Oha Fumihiro, Ishida Takashi, Yamane Shigeru

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hakodate Central General Hospital, Hon-cho 33-2, Hakodate, Hokkaido 040-8585, Japan.

出版信息

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Dec;16(6):513-8. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200312000-00005.

Abstract

Cervical fusion cages have been developed to provide an anterior structural support without harvesting tricortical iliac bone. Limited numbers of investigations have focused on pitfalls of anterior cervical fusion using cage implants. The objective of this study is to report clinical results and implant-related complications in anterior cervical fusion using titanium mesh and anterior plating. Twenty-four cases with anterior cervical fusion using a titanium mesh with local autograft and anterior plating were reviewed. One-level fusion was performed in 7 cases, and 17 patients underwent two-level fusion with corpectomy. The mean follow-up period was 27 months. Radiographic assessment included sagittal alignment, fusion status, and complications related to cage implants. Iliac bone graft harvesting was obviated in all the patients, whereas 15 patients required concomitant use of ceramic bone substitute. Sagittal alignment of the operative level was lordotic in 19 cases (79%) and neutral in 5 cases (21%) at the final follow-up. No late kyphotic collapse was observed. Twenty-three cases (96%) achieved a solid fusion, whereas the time to fusion was averaged 6.2 months. Cage subsidence frequently occurred in 42% of upper vertebrae and 50% of lower vertebrae. The use of titanium mesh and local autograft for anterior cervical fusion obviated the need for harvesting iliac bone block and provided structural anterior column support. However, it required a longer period to achieve a solid fusion when compared with tricortical iliac autograft. Cage subsidence was frequently observed in the early postoperative period.

摘要

颈椎融合器已被研发出来,用于提供前路结构支撑,而无需取自体三面皮质髂骨。仅有少数研究关注使用融合器植入物进行颈椎前路融合的缺陷。本研究的目的是报告使用钛网和前路钢板进行颈椎前路融合的临床结果及与植入物相关的并发症。回顾了24例使用钛网联合局部自体骨移植及前路钢板进行颈椎前路融合的病例。7例行单节段融合,17例患者行双节段椎体次全切除融合术。平均随访时间为27个月。影像学评估包括矢状位对线、融合情况以及与融合器植入物相关的并发症。所有患者均无需取自体髂骨,而15例患者需要同时使用陶瓷骨替代物。末次随访时,手术节段矢状位对线呈前凸的有19例(79%),呈中立位的有5例(21%)。未观察到晚期后凸塌陷。23例(96%)实现了牢固融合,而融合时间平均为6.2个月。42%的上位椎体和50%的下位椎体频繁出现融合器下沉。使用钛网和局部自体骨进行颈椎前路融合无需取髂骨块,并提供了前路结构支撑。然而,与自体三面皮质髂骨移植相比,实现牢固融合所需时间更长。术后早期频繁观察到融合器下沉。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验